Are fixed-term contracts 'sleazy?' Koodo responds
Thursday, November 27, 2008 | 03:48 PM ET
by Paul Jay, CBCNews.ca
Yesterday I noted that Koodo's latest ad campaign includes a jingle calling fixed-term contracts "sleazy" and wondered at the inconsistency of the message, given that Koodo parent Telus (and many other wireless carriers) have such contracts.
Today I had a chance to talk to Chief Koodo Officer Kevin Banderk about the ads. Here is his response:
"It's really just about speaking differently to the wireless audience. I think given the context of the carols you wanted words that would pop out and grab people's attention, so it's more to do with grabbing people's attention than it is to try to denegrate any of our competitors.I think that our view here is we offer a smart alternative to the other wireless competitors. There is value to fixed-term contracts, they offer things we can't - you'll never see a zero dollar Blackberry Pearl from us because we just can't afford it without doing that kind of three-year fixed term kind of thing. So there is value to it, for those people who don't mind being locked in.
But we also know there is a large segment of the population who wants more transparency and flexibility and they tend to just focus more on the talk and text, that's the audience we're seeking and really trying to reach and you know I think that's the approach we're taking.
So you know, if I was using it in everyday conversation I'd never use the term sleazy or the company would never use the term sleazy, but I think given the context of the Christmas carol you clearly want words that pop out and go - wait, that's not a normal Christmas song, what's going on here? - and so they listen.
That's the approach. I don't think here we have any belief that there is anything really being done by any of the other carriers to trick or to be sleazy but we just want people to be very aware that there are alternatives to what all the big guys offer."
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
This discussion is now Open. Submit your Comment.
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
Post a Comment
Tech Bytes »
Recent Posts
- Jesse Brown: Worldwide copyfight heats up down under
- Wednesday, February 25, 2009
- Alas, that’s not Atlantis, Google says
- Monday, February 23, 2009
- Jesse Brown: Government strangely closed about open source
- Thursday, February 19, 2009
- Is traffic management working?
- Thursday, February 19, 2009
- Jesse Brown: Last chance to chime in on Net Neutrality
- Wednesday, February 11, 2009
- Subscribe to Tech Bytes
Archives
- February 2009 (10)
- January 2009 (12)
- December 2008 (10)
- November 2008 (10)
- October 2008 (9)
- September 2008 (4)
- August 2008 (4)
- July 2008 (16)
- June 2008 (9)
- May 2008 (12)
- April 2008 (15)
- March 2008 (13)
- February 2008 (13)
- January 2008 (47)
- December 2007 (12)
- November 2007 (12)
- October 2007 (17)
- September 2007 (18)
- August 2007 (17)
- July 2007 (27)
- June 2007 (18)
- May 2007 (28)
- April 2007 (25)
- March 2007 (28)
- February 2007 (25)
- January 2007 (35)
- December 2006 (25)
Comments
Janus
Ottawa
It must be difficult to have meaningful conversations when words have no meaning. Thanks for providing us with yet another reason to view advertizers with disdain.
Posted November 27, 2008 06:00 PM