NFL could suspend 4 linebackers over PED probe

The NFL is still seeking an audience with the four linebackers it's investigating for an alleged link to performance-enhancing drugs.

Players will be suspended if they don't speak to League by Aug. 25

The NFL plans to suspend linebackers James Harrison, left, Clay Mathews, right, as well as Julius Peppers and Mike Neal for PED use if they don't speak to the League by Aug. 25. (Patrick Smith/Justin K. Aller/Getty Images)

The NFL is still seeking an audience with the four linebackers it's investigating for an alleged link to performance-enhancing drugs.

The league's latest message to James Harrison, Clay Matthews, Mike Neal and Julius Peppers came with an ominous and onerous threat: Answer our questions in the next 10 days, or start your suspension.

NFL senior vice-president of labour policy and league affairs Adolpho Birch sent a letter Monday to the NFL Players Association detailing a plan to suspend Harrison, Matthews, Peppers and Neal if they don't speak with the league by Aug. 25.

Their punishment would then start the following day on an indefinite basis, to be ended at the discretion of Commissioner Roger Goodell once an interview has been completed.

Birch's memo to the union was obtained by The Associated Press, according to a person with knowledge of the investigation who's not authorized to speak publicly about it.

Dispute elevates 

Harrison, a 14-year veteran, is a longtime leader for the Pittsburgh Steelers. Matthews and Peppers are key cogs in Green Bay's defence, and Neal is currently a free agent who spent the past six seasons with the Packers. Harrison, Matthews and Peppers have been picked for the Pro Bowl a combined 20 times.

The NFL first notified the quartet on Jan. 11 about the investigation into a television report by Al-Jazeera featuring allegations made by Charlie Sly, who worked as an intern at an anti-aging clinic, about the use of banned performance-enhancing drugs by several athletes including the four linebackers. Sly later recanted his claims.

Birch, in his letter, said the league has made "at least seven attempts" to arrange the interviews.

Goodell's power to punish has been a prickly issue between the NFL and the union in recent years, so the elevation of this dispute was not surprising since it revolves around the potential of player discipline and how it fits within the collective bargaining agreement.

Players demand proof 

The stance of the players has been steadfast in this case, refusing to be interviewed without being presented with what they've called credible evidence. Affidavits were sent by the NFLPA on behalf of the players to substitute for the interviews. Birch dismissed each as simply half-page statements, which were "wholly devoid of any detail." Birch also said the league determined that an assertion made in Neal's affidavit was "demonstrably false."

Harrison said in his statement, sent to Birch July 25 by the NFLPA, he never met nor communicated with the source of the report and has never violated the NFL's policy on performance-enhancing substances.

"Neither the CBA nor the policy state that a player must agree to an in-person interview based upon random, baseless verbal remarks or face discipline for a failure to co-operate with a league investigation," union attorney Heather McPhee wrote then on Harrison's behalf.

Birch cited Article 46 of the CBA in noting the discipline that can come for nonco-operation or obstruction. Such a suspension would be separate from any possible future determination of violation of the steroid policy.

"We cannot accept your unilateral assertion that the cursory, untested statements you have submitted satisfy the players' obligation," Birch wrote.

Retired quarterback Peyton Manning was also cited in Al-Jazeera's doping report in December. The NFL announced last month it has closed its separate probe on Manning, who granted interviews and provided all records sought by league investigators.


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Become a CBC Member

Join the conversationCreate account

Already have an account?