Roger Scruton: Science alone can't explain what makes us human
Respectable Victorians were outraged when Charles Darwin unveiled his theory of natural selection. The very idea that humans descended from primate ancestors and were, in fact, on a continuum with the rest of the animal kingdom was a humiliating demotion from being created in God's image.
One wonders what those Victorians would have thought of the advances made by evolutionary psychology and neuroscience in recent decades.
As increasingly sophisticated brain-scanning technology has revealed more and more of the fantastically complicated workings of the human brain, the more the mystique of exalted human qualities like creativity, altruism, ethics and rational thought has been wiped away.
Even the soul, some neuroscientists say, resides in the biological wiring of our grey matter.
That kind of thinking gets Sir Roger Scruton's dander up. He's an engaging, entertaining and outspoken thinker with an unusually high public profile for a philosopher.
Scruton is the author of dozens of books, the latest being On Human Nature.
On Human Nature is largely a critique of what he calls "biological reductionism" and "nothing but-tery": The idea that "thinking is nothing but a process in the pre-frontal cortex, or fear is nothing but a stimulation of the amygdala," he told Michael Enright in an interview. "That somehow you get the view that you haven't just explained things, you've explained it away. There's no longer any mystery to it."
"It isn't the brain that's doing the thinking; it's 'I' who am doing the thinking. You could take a person's brain to pieces and you'd never find the thing that calls itself 'I'."
On the nation-state
At the same time, he is deeply dismayed by the rise of nationalist populism as an ascendant force in political conservatism, in the form of Donald Trump and far-right movements across Europe.
"I think the nation-state is a very important fact of the modern world, and it's something we should hold on to. And I think that national loyalties are very necessary," he told Michael Enright.
But, he added, "It doesn't follow, of course, that we should be, in some chauvinistic and bigoted way, attached uniquely to our own little bailiwick and ignoring other people. I think that one must distinguish a proper, humane patriotism from the excited nationalism that ruined Europe in the last century."
Click 'listen' above to hear the full interview.