The Sunday Edition

How close are we to the end of the world?

The Doomsday Clock is now closest it has been to global catastrophe, since the height of the cold war in 1953. North Korea has stepped up its missile testing program, sanctions and diplomacy have failed, and President Trump plans to beef up his nuclear arsenal. Michael's guest is Sharon Squassoni, director of the Proliferation Prevention Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
January 26, 2017, Washington, DC. For the first time in the 70-year history of the Doomsday Clock, the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists moved the clock forward 30 seconds to two and a half minutes before midnight, citing, among other factors, "ill-considered" statements by U.S. President Donald Trump on nuclear weapons. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

By December 1991, the Cold War was over. The United States and the Soviet Union agreed to dismantle and decommission a significant portion of their nuclear stockpiles. Almost giddy with optimism, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists announced it would reset the Doomsday Clock to 17 minutes before midnight … midnight meaning nuclear annihilation. 

Still perhaps a little too close for comfort, but it appeared to signal the end of the waking nuclear nightmare that had gripped the world ever since the Soviet-American arms race kicked in after the Second World War.

7th October 1953: Margaret Rowe, a clerical officer in the Home Office Civil Defence Region studying a model of London's dock area, as part of a Civil Defence exercise to determine the problems and effects of an atom bomb falling in this vital area. (Lee/Central Press/Getty Images)

Since that hopeful moment more than 25 years ago, the Doomsday Clock has ticked its way ever closer back toward midnight. In late January of this year, the Bulletin's board of directors moved the clock another 30 seconds forward to two and a half minutes before midnight. The minute hand hasn't been this close to that fateful hour since 1953.

Center for Strategic and International Studies' Proliferation Prevention Program Director Sharon Squassoni. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

It isn't just the flagging momentum of nuclear disarmament that worries the keepers of the Clock. They also cite a number of other complex threats to human life … a global failure to meaningfully address climate change, powerful technologies that threaten to spiral beyond human control, rising nationalist movements around the world … and they cite the election of Donald Trump, who has mused openly about encouraging nuclear proliferation and restarting a nuclear arms race. 

Sharon Squassoni is a member of the Science and Security Board of The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. She's also the director of the Proliferation Prevention Program at Center for Strategic and International Studies and formerly worked for the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency and with the Congressional Research Service at the Library of Congress. 

Click the button above to hear Michael's interview with Sharon Squassoni.


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.