The Current

Clerk's comments before justice committee risked 'raising the perception of bias'

Ottawa was gripped when Michael Wernick, clerk of the privy council, spoke before the justice committee Thursday. But has it shed any more light on the SNC-Lavalin affair? We ask three experts to dissect what he had to say.

Michael Wernick’s testimony felt like a circling of the wagons: professor

Clerk of the Privy Council Michael Wernick waits to appear before the justice committee meeting in Ottawa on Thursday. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)
Listen19:37

Read Story transcript

Clerk of the Privy Council Michael Wernick's comments before the justice committee Thursday could create the "perception of bias," according to a political scientist.

"I think what raised questions or raised my eyebrows was the fairly effusive praise and some of the language," including his words about "the prime minister's actions and integrity," said Emmett Macfarlane, an associate professor of political science at the University of Waterloo.

As Canada's top civil servant, Wernick is tasked with serving the prime minister and his cabinet, but is expected to remain non-partisan.

However, his testimony "gave the impression of the kind of circling-the-wagons effect," Macfarlane told The Current's guest host Laura Lynch.

"My concern is not that he actually necessarily holds bias, but that he risked in his comments raising the perception of bias, and I think that's an important distinction."

Speaking before the justice committee yesterday, Wernick said that no inappropriate pressure had been put on former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould to override the decision to prosecute SNC-Lavalin, but noted he had warned her about economic "consequences" of criminal proceedings.

The Current requested an interview with Wernick, but he declined.

Liberal MP Jody Wilson-Raybould leaves the Parliament buildings following Question Period in Ottawa on Tuesday. She is expected to testify next week in hearings over whether the Prime Minister's Office improperly pressured her to help Montreal engineering giant SNC-Lavalin avoid criminal prosecution. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

Questions over whether Wilson-Raybould was pressured to intervene in the criminal case have dogged the federal Liberal government for weeks. She has not commented on the accusations — citing solicitor-client privilege — but is expected to testify before the committee next week.

To discuss whether the clerk's appearance sheds any new light in the political shadows, Lynch was joined by:

  • Althia Raj, Ottawa bureau chief for HuffPost Canada.
  • Emmett Macfarlane, an associate professor in political science at the University of Waterloo.
  • Norman Spector, who served as chief of staff under former Conservative prime minister Brian Mulroney.

Click 'listen' near the top of this page to hear the full conversation.


With files from CBC News. Produced by Julie Crysler, Sarah-Joyce Battersby and Jessica Linzey.

Comments

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.