CBC In Depth
INDEPTH: HEALTH CARE
The ruling: In reaction
CBC News Online | February 16, 2006

On Thursday, June 9, 2005, the Supreme Court of Canada overturned a Quebec law preventing people from buying private health insurance to pay for medical services available through the publicly funded system.

The Quebec and federal governments has asked the court for a stay before the decision takes effect. The court later agreed to suspend is decision for 12 months retroactive to June 9, 2005.

Premier Jean Charest responded in February 2006. He said the private sector could play a role in health care in Quebec, but said he remained committed to public health care. He also said Quebec will introduce guaranteed wait times for procedures including some radiation treatments and cardiac surgery, as well as knee and hip replacements and cataract operations.

While the ruling applies only to Quebec, there are concerns that it could fundamentally change the way health care is delivered across the country. Canada is currently the only major industrialized country that does not allow any private administration of health-care services that are provided by the public system.

The following is a sampling of reaction to the court ruling.


Access to a waiting list is not access to health care.
– Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin and Justice John Major wrote in the decision.

We're not going to have a two-tier health-care system in this country. What we want to do is to strengthen the public health-care system.
– Prime Minister Paul Martin.

The decision means the fundamental laws [governing health care] do not violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. That being the case, then the overall structure of health care is sound �This is not an opening of the floodgates for the destruction of Canada�s health-care system.
– Roy Romanow, chair of the Royal Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada.

Today's decision represents a stinging indictment of the failure of governments to respond to the mountains of studies and years of research with real action for our health-care system.
– Dr. Albert Schumacher, president of the Canadian Medical Association

This is the end of medicare as we know it. This is a breach in government monopoly health care in this country. It's going to open up litigation across the country in the other nine provinces as taxpayers there press for the same right, which is the right to seek and buy insurance to cover private health care.
– John Williamson, president of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation

We have to strengthen the public health-care system so there is no need for a private system, and we are on the way to doing that.
– Federal Health Minister Ujjal Dosanjh

Canadians have to understand it's not a $50 or a $500 or even a $5,000 issue. There's only one way to deal with the expensive treatments and that's to share it.
– Sharon Sholzberg-Gray of the Canadian Healthcare Association

Really what [the] judgment has done is it�s given humans the same right as animals. You can buy insurance, private health insurance for your pets, you can buy private health insurance as a foreigner, but until now Canadians were outlawed from that so that has been struck down.
– Dr. Brian Day, of the Cambie Surgery Clinic in Vancouver, B.C., which was granted intervener status when the case was before the court in 2004

Canadians do not want to become a society where only the wealthy can afford hip replacements. We must find innovative solutions to deliver care if we are going to sustain and revitalize our publicly funded, not-for-profit and publicly administered health system � Promoting privately owned health services will lead to a deterioration of public health service delivery in Canada.
– Deborah Tamlyn, president of the Canadian Nurses Association

This is a great victory for all Canadians. It will be a new start for health care in the country.
– Dr. Jacques Chaoulli, one of the two plaintiffs in the case. Represented himself in the Supreme Court hearing in 2004.









^TOP
MENU

HEALTH CARE: MAIN PAGE SUPREME COURT DECISION RULING REACTION PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE HEALTH CARE CALGARY'S HEALTH SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL HEALTH CARE DELIVERY STUDIED TO DEATH? - The Mazankowski Report - The Senate Report - The Romanow Report PRICE OF CARE WAITING FOR ACCESS THE FIRST MINISTERS CONFERENCE ON HEALTH CARE CONFERENCE QUOTES FAMILY DOCTORS NURSES PHARMACARE FAQs
MEDICAL INSURANCE: TRAVEL MEDICAL INSURANCE
MEDICAL TOURISM: PART 1 PART 2
RELATED: HEALTH ISSUES Health concerns Drugs Genetics and reproduction West Nile virus Mad cow disease SARS Anthrax Flu Tuberculosis Food Safety

CBC ARCHIVES:
The Birth of Medicare

Chasing a cure for Diabetes

The Fluoride Debate

New heart for newborn baby

Polio: Combating the Crippler

VIEWPOINT:
Virginia Robinson: Emergency room diary

EXTERNAL LINKS:
CBC does not endorse and is not responsible for the content of external sites. Links will open in new window.

Canada's Health Care System

Canada Health Act

Canadian Institute for Health Information - Health Care in Canada 2005

Canadian Health Coalition � Found: Federal funding. Lost: A plan to stem privatization [pdf]

Canadian Institute for Health Information

Report: National Health Expenditure Trends [pdf]

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Public Expenditure on health, % of GDP [Excel file]

The Romanow report [pdf]

The Senate Report on health care

MORE:
Print this page

Send a comment

Indepth Index