Judge grants Trump's request for special master to review documents seized from Mar-a-Lago

In a legal victory for former U.S. president Donald Trump, a federal judge on Monday granted his request for a special master to review documents seized by the FBI from his Florida home and also temporarily halted the Justice Department's own use of the records for investigative purposes.

Decision will likely slow Justice Department's investigation into top-secret information taken to Florida

A man on a city street gestures with his fist.
Donald Trump departs Trump Tower on Aug. 10, two days after FBI agents conducted a search at his Mar-a-Lago home in Palm Beach, Fla. Trump had his request granted Monday for a special master to examine the seized documents. (David 'Dee' Delgado/Reuters)

In a legal victory for former U.S. president Donald Trump, a federal judge on Monday granted his request for a special master to review documents seized by the FBI from his Florida home and also temporarily halted the Justice Department's own use of the records for investigative purposes.

The decision by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon authorizes an outside expert to review the records taken during the Aug. 8 search and to weed out from the rest of the investigation any that might be protected by claims of attorney-client privilege or executive privilege. Some of those records may ultimately be returned to him, but the judge put off a ruling on that question.

The order came despite the strenuous objections of the Justice Department, which said an outside legal expert was not necessary in part because officials had already completed their review of potentially privileged documents. The department said Monday it was reviewing the decision, but did not indicate if and when it might appeal.

The order will almost certainly slow the pace of the department's investigation into the presence of top-secret information at Mar-a-Lago, particularly given the judge's directive that the Justice Department may not for the moment use any of the seized materials as part of its investigation into the illegal storage of government secrets at the Florida property. That injunction is in place until the yet-to-be-named special master completes his or her work, "or further court order."

"The court is mindful that restraints on criminal prosecutions are disfavoured, but finds that these unprecedented circumstances call for a brief pause to allow for neutral, third-party review to ensure a just process with adequate safeguards," Cannon, a Trump appointee, wrote in her 24-page order.

Several printed pages laid out together with large black boxes covering the majority of text.
Pages from the affidavit by the FBI in support of obtaining a search warrant for Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate. (Jon Elswick/The Associated Press)

Trump reacts on social media platform

Even so, it is not clear that the decision will have a significant effect on any investigative or charging decisions or the ultimate outcome of the probe. A separate assessment by the U.S. intelligence community of the risk posed by the apparent mishandling of classified records will continue under the judge's order.

"While this is a victory for the former president, it is by no means an overwhelming win for him," David Weinstein, a Florida criminal defence lawyer and former Justice Department prosecutor, said in an email. "While it is a setback for the government, it is also not a devastating loss for them."

He noted, for instance, that the judge did not immediately order the seized documents returned to Trump or that any of the evidence be suppressed.

Justice Department spokesperson Anthony Coley said Monday that "the United States is examining the opinion and will consider appropriate next steps in the ongoing litigation." A lawyer for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

However, in a post on his Truth Social platform following Cannon's ruling, Trump wrote: "Remember, it takes courage and 'guts' to fight a totally corrupt Department of 'Justice' and the FBI."

The department and Trump's lawyers are to submit by Friday a list of proposed special master candidates.

Seized material includes personal documents

FBI agents in August seized roughly 11,000 documents and 1,800 other items from Mar-a-Lago as part of a criminal investigation into the retention of national defence information there, as well as into efforts to obstruct the probe. About 100 of the documents contained classification markings.

Trump's lawyers had argued that a special master — usually an outside lawyer or former judge — was necessary to ensure an independent review of records taken during the search. Such a review was necessary, they have said, so that any personal information or documents recovered by the FBI could be filtered out and returned to Trump and so that any documents protected by privilege could also be segregated from the rest of the investigation.

In this case, the seized records "include medical documents, correspondence related to taxes and accounting information," according to the judge's order.

The judge said it was too soon to know whether any of the records will be returned to Trump, but "for now, the circumstances surrounding the seizure in this case and the associated need for adequate procedural safeguards are sufficiently compelling to at least get plaintiff past the courthouse doors."

This image contained in a court filing by the Department of Justice, and redacted in part by the FBI, shows a photo of documents seized during the Aug. 8 search. (Department of Justice/The Associated Press)

'A whole lot of special treatment'

Though Cannon did not order the Justice Department to immediately return any of the seized documents to Trump, she said she found persuasive his lawyers' arguments that he faced potentially "irreparable injury" by being denied access to records that might be of significant personal interest to him. She said the investigative process had, so far, been "closed off" to him.

"As a function of plaintiff's former position as president of the United States, the stigma associated with the subject seizure is in a league of its own," Cannon wrote. "A future indictment, based to any degree on property that ought to be returned, would result in reputational harm of a decidedly different order of magnitude."

"This is not something courts do," Jonathan Shaub, a former U.S. Justice Department attorney, said of the decision.

He said it was odd for Cannon to block the Justice Department from reviewing the records at this stage in the investigation, before an indictment has even been returned.

"It's giving a whole lot of special treatment," Shaub said.

WATCH | What are the implications of the judge's decision?: 

Judge grants Trump's request for special master to review seized documents

7 months ago
Duration 2:06
A U.S. judge has granted former president Donald Trump's request to appoint a special master to review documents that were seized by the Justice Department from Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, Fla., last month.

The Justice Department had argued against the appointment, saying it was unnecessary because it had already reviewed potentially privileged documents and identified a limited subset of materials that could be covered by attorney-client privilege.

The department had been using a separate "privilege review team" for that work, but Cannon cited at least two instances in which members of the investigative team were "exposed" to potentially privileged material, something she said raised questions about the adequacy of the process.

The department had also said that Trump was not entitled to the return of any of the presidential records that were taken since he is no longer president and the documents therefore do not belong to him. And personal items that were recovered were commingled with classified information, giving them potential value as evidence, the department has said.

Though prosecutors had argued that Trump, as a former president, had no legal basis to assert executive privilege over the documents, the judge said he was entitled to raise it as a concern and allowed for the special master to look for records that might be covered by that privilege.

"The major sticking point, I think, is that the executive privilege documents were included" in the judge's decision, said Richard Serafini, a Florida criminal defence lawyer and former Justice Department prosecutor. He said he expected the department to appeal the order.

Cannon, who was nominated to the bench by Trump in 2020, had signalled in a brief order last month that she was inclined to appoint a special master and did so again during arguments last week, asking at one point, "Ultimately, what is the harm in the appointment of a special master to sort through these issues without creating undue delay?"

With files from Reuters