Harry and Meghan get their freedom, but at what cost?
Power of their brand appears strong in short term, but there may be long-term challenges
Hello, royal watchers. This is your biweekly dose of royal news and analysis. Reading this online? Sign up here to get this delivered to your inbox every other Friday.
You're in or you're out. You can't be a part-time working member of the Royal Family.
After 10 days of intense speculation sparked by Prince Harry and Meghan's announcement they wanted to step back as senior members of the family, some clarity emerged with the latest word Saturday from Queen Elizabeth and Buckingham Palace.
And while the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have gained some freedom, they may not have received everything they wanted as they seek to forge their new path, which will include some time living in Canada.
"What's proved impossible is for them to pick and choose what they are interested in undertaking while rejecting the role of a senior member of the Royal Family," said Carolyn Harris, a Toronto-based royal author and historian.
They won't be using their HRH titles. They won't be doing royal duties or receiving any public funds for those duties, and are paying back the 2.4 million pounds ($4 million Cdn) spent from the Sovereign Grant to refurbish their new home at Frogmore Cottage — a situation that had become a significant point of public criticism around the couple in the U.K.
They'll keep their private patronages and associations, the statement from Buckingham Palace said, and Harry and Meghan "have made clear that everything they do will continue to uphold the values" of the Queen.
While there had been some speculation they might continue to do some duties on behalf of Elizabeth, Saturday's announcement ruled that out.
It's clear, said Harris, that it was impossible for them to be part-time members of the Royal Family.
As they step back from royal duties, that will include official military appointments, a move that seems particularly poignant for Harry, given his years of service and devotion to supporting soldiers and their families.
Harris said she thinks giving up the military role was all part of the process of stepping back as a senior member of the family. It may also allow Harry more flexibility to spend time outside the U.K., because there won't be the interest or requirement to be present for military events that fall at fixed times each year.
The announcement also seems to suggest Harry won't have the leadership role that he was taking on for the Commonwealth, following his appointment by the Queen as a youth ambassador in 2018.
As much as Saturday's announcement offered some clarity, significant questions remain, particularly around security for the couple and who would pay for that — another topic that has become a lightning rod for public comment in the past few days.
"It's clear that's still an issue," said Harris.
Buckingham Palace said it does not comment "on the details of security arrangements," and there are "well-established independent processes to determine the need for publicly funded security."
There is also little sense from Saturday's announcement of how Harry and Meghan might gain the financial independence they have said they are seeking as they move to develop their own brand.
In the short term, the power of that brand is "quite a lot," said Mark Borkowski, a British public relations expert.
"How to maintain it is going to be difficult. They're going to have to rely on a lot of friends to provide them with some of the stuff gratis — homes and whatever," Borkowski said earlier this week.
"I'm sure they can raise a lot of money for charities. I'm sure the foundation could be powerful. But I don't think it will give them the lifestyle money, and the further they get away … they lose that royal sheen."
Saturday's announcement suggests there was some sensitivity to the criticism that had arisen, in particular around the renovations at Frogmore Cottage.
"By paying back the expenses, that will hopefully lay to rest the controversy regarding how the renovations unfolded," said Harris.
Harris said she thinks they are eager to keep Frogmore Cottage as their residence when they are in the United Kingdom.
"There would likely have been calls for it to be reassigned if they were continuing living there, and the money was not repaid," she said.
There is also a sense that there may have been some attempt to further manage the public chatter around Harry and Meghan, given the timing of announcement, coming early Saturday evening in the U.K.
"There may be efforts to minimize the attention on it," said Harris.
Still, how this all works out for Harry and Meghan remains a big question. The Queen said the couple and their son, Archie, will "always be much-loved members of my family."
But while they have gained more freedom, said Harris, the door has also been closed "to having an expanded role in the Royal Family if their new course does not unfold as they expect."
And there remains much uncertainty about how the public will respond to all this.
"I think sympathy for Harry and Meghan going forward will depend on what they decide to do," said Harris.
If they move toward a more celebrity lifestyle, Harris suggested, they may lose some sympathy. "If they devote their time to charitable work … that will likely attract more popular support."
Putting down royal roots
Wherever Harry and Meghan end up living while they are in Canada, they won't be the first members of the Royal Family to put down roots on this side of the Atlantic Ocean — even temporarily.
The first royal resident of any significant duration arrived long before Canada's Confederation.
WATCH | Why Harry and Meghan are stepping back from royal roles
Prince Edward, the fourth son of King George III and the father of Queen Victoria, lived in and near Quebec City and in Halifax in the 1790s.
But the experienced military man wasn't thinking in terms of a permanent residency.
"He had an extended time here, but he always knew that time would come to an end even if he reached the rank of commander in chief of the British North American forces," said Harris.
Still, there is the sense he enjoyed his time here.
"He found the social life was much more informal and he was able to appear in public with his mistress, Julie de St. Laurent," said Harris.
"He found it to be quite a change when he returned to Britain and there were clear social barriers to Julie de St. Laurent being his partner in a public manner in the way she had been during his time in Canada, where she was clearly acting as a hostess."
More than a century later, another Prince Edward — the one who went on to become King Edward VIII before his abdication — bought a ranch in Alberta. And it seems he had a great fondness for the property he purchased south of Calgary in 1919, especially in the early years of his ownership.
"He wrote to his mother that this was real life and he started describing himself in his speeches as a westerner when he was in the West, and as a Canadian," said Harris. "That was pioneering in many ways for a member of the Royal Family to describe themselves as a Canadian when they were in Canada."
WATCH | Could Harry and Meghan make B.C. their home?
Still, Edward's ranch caused some worry back home with his father, King George V, Harris said. His concerns focused on the possibility that it might seem one dominion — Canada — was being singled out and Edward could face pressure to buy land elsewhere, such as a farm in the Australian outback or a house in South Africa.
A similar pressure might arise for Harry and Meghan, Harris suggested, "pressure not necessarily to purchase property, but to spend more time in other Commonwealth realms."
What about the media?
Amid the speculation about the reasons behind Harry and Meghan's decision to step back, much has been said about the coverage they have received in the British media, particularly from the tabloids.
Can living part-time in Canada really insulate them from that?
Not necessarily, or perhaps not completely, even if their media experience while they've been in Canada has been relatively tame in comparison.
The British tabloid press has a unique history, said Borkowski.
"It won't take long for an ambitious freelance unit to be set up [in Canada] … feeding not just the British press but the international press. Someone's going to make a lot of money from them moving to North America."
Readers share their views
Readers of The Royal Fascinator were eager to share a wide range of views on the events of the past week. Several were willing to welcome Harry and Meghan to Canada, but not to see their tax dollars pay for their security.
Here is a brief selection of comments and edited excerpts from messages readers sent.
"Although I can understand Harry and Meghan not wanting to live under old world rules, would the Canadian taxpayer really have to pay for their security? They are financially very well off. And as much as they seem to be a lovely young couple with an adorable baby boy, they should be paying for their own security. We have enough going on in Canada without having to pay for wealthy runaways who supposedly want anonymity!" — Pat King, Toronto.
"I do believe, being a royal fan/follower since I was a little girl, that Harry and Meg should be able to decide on their own how their lives should be lived and where. I understand the monarchy protocols, but Harry is so far down the line now that if he wants to gain financial independence with his wife and child, then so be it. One would hope that the monarchy will work out the plan that works well for all. Being a Canadian, I can't help but be biased.... We would love to see them move here — the land of nice!" — Tina Forbes, Hamilton-Niagara area
"I am probably in the minority but it was wonderful not seeing Meghan and Harry for six weeks. When you put someone like Harry together with a strong, narcissistic personality like Meghan, it is a matter of time before the less strong person is dominated. Meghan comes from the liberal state of California who firmly believe their opinions are the only right ones…. If William was level-headed and sincere in his talk with Harry about rushing to marry Meghan and Harry went on a tirade of silence, shame on immature Harry. I firmly believe Meghan is the catalyst of the entire bad feelings, damaged brother relations, etc. Harry, William and Catherine made an awesome team." — Kathleen Norris
"I do hope they can have a wonderful life and continue their good work." — Pam Harrison
Sign up here to have The Royal Fascinator newsletter land in your inbox every other Friday.
I'm always happy to hear from you. Send your ideas, comments, feedback and notes to firstname.lastname@example.org. Problems with the newsletter? Please let me know about any typos, errors or glitches.
With a file from The Associated Press