Metrojet Flight 9268 crash sparks theories about mechanical failure, missiles and bombs

As the first bodies from the Metrojet Flight 9268 wreckage are returned to loved ones in Russia, investigators are left with the daunting task of figuring out how a commercial airliner suddenly broke apart in mid-air, scattering pieces over Egypt's Sinai Province.

Authorities ask people to 'refrain from drawing conclusions' as investigation continues

Egyptian Prime Minister Sherif Ismail looks at the remains of a Russian airliner after it crashed in central Sinai on Saturday. It's not clear what caused the crash, but theories about mechanical failure, ISIS missiles and bombs are already being bandied about. (Reuters)

As the first bodies from the Metrojet Flight 9268 wreckage are returned to loved ones in Russia, investigators are left with the daunting task of figuring out how a commercial airliner suddenly broke apart in mid-air, scattering pieces over Egypt's Sinai Province. 

Metrojet's Airbus A321-200 crashed Saturday 23 minutes after taking off from the Egyptian Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh en route to St. Petersburg. Russian officials say it broke up at high altitude, killing all 224 people on board.

The cause is unknown and Russian aviation authorities have cautioned people to "refrain from drawing conclusions" at this early stage of the investigation.

But already people have questioned whether the plane was fit to fly, ISIS claims to have shot it down with a missile, and military experts suggest a bomb may have been smuggled aboard. 

Mechanical failure

Since the crash, a handful of people have come forward to say the plane was in bad shape before it ever left the ground — allegations the airline denies. 

Natalya Trukhacheva, identified as the wife of co-pilot Sergei Trukachev, said in an interview with Russian state-controlled NTV that her husband complained the "technical condition of the aircraft left much to be desired" before taking off on Saturday.

Another source at Sharm el-Sheikh airport told Russian news agency Ria Novosti the plane had experienced "engine start failures several times over the past week," and that crew had flagged these issues to airport technicians, according to the U.K.'s Independent newspaper

Metrojet deputy director Alexander Smirnov says the airline has ruled out human or mechanical error as potential causes of Flight 9268's crash. (Denis Tyrin/Associated Press)

The Globe and Mail reports the plane has had problems in the past, noting it was out of commission for several months in 2001 after the underside of the rear fuselage slammed into the runway during a bad landing in Cairo.

The airline, however, has denied any suggestions the plane wasn't up to snuff. 

"We rule out a technical fault of the plane or a pilot error," Alexander Smirnov, deputy general director of Metrojet, told a news conference Monday in Moscow. "The only possible explanation could be an external impact on the airplane."

Russian aviation agency's Alexander Neradko decried Metrojet's comments as "premature and not based on any real facts," but a number of experts have backed up Smirnov's claim that a mechanical failure is unlikely to cause a catastrophe on the scale of what happened to Flight 9268.

When planes break up in mid-air, experts say, it's usually because of one of three factors: a weather event, a collision or an external threat such as a bomb or a missile.

So far, it appears the skies were clear when Flight 9268 went down.

Shot down by an ISIS missile 

Wilayat Sinai, a local affiliate of the extremist group ISIS, claims it shot the plane down with a missile as retaliation for Russian airstrikes in Syria.

Russian and Egyptian officials have dismissed the militants' claims as fabrications and a number of experts have dismissed the possibility a missile could reach the plane at 10 km above ground. 

"They can put out whatever statements they want but there is no proof at this point that terrorists were responsible for this plane crash," Mohamed Samir, an Egyptian army spokesman, told the Guardian newspaper. "The army sees no authenticity to the claims."

An ISIS flag flies over the customs office of Syria's Jarablus border gate on Aug. 1. A local affiliate of the extremist group says it shot down Flight 9268 with a missile in retaliation for Russian aggression in Syria. (Murad Sezer/Reuters)

British military analyst Paul Beaver told The Associated Press that it's very unlikely ISIS possess a missile system capable of hitting a target at such a high altitude 

"That's a very serious piece of equipment, and I don't think they have that sophistication," he said. 

What's more, he added, the Sinai desert is well scrutinized by intelligence agencies, so a missile system would have been seen.

Bomb on board 

The more likely scenario, Beaver said, is that a bomb was on board. 

Michael Clarke of the Royal United Services Institute think-tank, agrees. He told the BBC that reports of the aircraft splitting in two suggest a "catastrophic failure, not a mechanical failure," which could mean an explosion on board.

"If we have to guess at this stage, it's much more likely to have been a bomb on board rather than a missile fired from the ground," he said. 

Todd Curtis, a former safety engineer with Boeing, said investigators will be looking at more unusual events, such as an on-board fire or corrosion that caused a structural failure. 

Flight 9268's flight recorder in seen on display at an undisclosed location in Egypt, on Sunday, Nov. 1, 2015. Investigators hope it will help shed light on what caused Saturday's tragedy and bring an end to speculation. (Russian Ministry for Emergency Situations/Associated Press)

Too soon to speculate 

Investigators, meanwhile, have not confirmed or denied any of these theories, cautioning people to be patient as the investigation is ongoing. 

Neradko says it will be possible to draw firm conclusions about the crash only after experts have studied the scattered fragments of the plane in Sinai and the content of its black boxes, which have been recovered and are in good condition. 

Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi cautioned that the cause of the crash may not be known for months. 

"It's very important that this issue is left alone and its causes are not speculated on," he told top government officials, including members of the military and security forces. The investigation "will take a long time" and "needs very advanced technologies."

A Russian investigator walks near wreckage a day after a passenger jet bound for St. Petersburg, Russia, crashed in Egypt on Saturday. Authorities caution the investigation is still in the early stages. (Amr Nabil/Associated Press)

With files from The Associated Press


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Become a CBC Member

Join the conversation  Create account

Already have an account?