Court temporarily delays release of Jan. 6 records as it mulls Trump's block request

A U.S. federal appeals court has temporarily blocked the release of records sought by a U.S. House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol as the court considers an emergency request by former president Donald Trump.

Records sought by U.S. House committee investigating insurrection at Capitol

Violent protesters loyal to Donald Trump storm the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6, as lawmakers were inside certifying Joe Biden's win in the presidential election. A U.S. federal appeals court has temporarily blocked the release of records sought by a U.S. House committee investigating the insurrection as the court considers an emergency request by Trump. (John Minchillo/The Associated Press)

A U.S. federal appeals court on Thursday temporarily blocked the release of White House records sought by a U.S. House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol, granting — for now — a request from former president Donald Trump.

The administrative injunction issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit effectively bars until the end of this month the release of records that were to be turned over Friday. The appeals court set arguments in the case for Nov. 30.

The stay gives the court time to consider arguments in a momentous clash between the former president, whose supporters stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, and President Joe Biden and Congress, who have pushed for a thorough investigation of the riot.

It delays the House committee from reviewing records that lawmakers say could shed light on the events leading up to the insurrection and Trump's efforts to de-legitimize an election he lost.

The National Archives, which holds the documents, says they include call logs, handwritten notes and a draft executive order on "election integrity."

WATCH | U.S. Senate report reveals intelligence failures ahead of Capitol siege: 

Senate report reveals intelligence failures ahead of Capitol siege

11 months ago
Duration 2:00
A U.S. Senate report on the Capitol insurrection reveals police had intelligence about a planned siege by Trump supporters at least two weeks prior, but the information never reached the officers who ultimately faced the angry mob.

Biden waived executive privilege on the documents. Trump then went to court arguing that as a former president, he still had the right to exert privilege over the records and that releasing them would damage the presidency in the future.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan on Tuesday rejected those arguments, noting in part, "Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President." She again denied an emergency motion by Trump on Wednesday.

In their emergency filing to the appeals court, Trump's lawyers wrote that without a stay, Trump would "suffer irreparable harm through the effective denial of a constitutional and statutory right to be fully heard on a serious disagreement between the former and incumbent president."

The Nov. 30 arguments will take place before three judges nominated by Democratic presidents: Patricia Millett and Robert Wilkins, nominated by former president Barack Obama, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, an appointee of Biden.

Given the case's magnitude, whichever side loses before the circuit court is likely to eventually appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Former U.S. president Trump, right, attends a baseball game in Atlanta on Oct. 30 with his wife, Melania. (Brynn Anderson/The Associated Press)

The White House on Thursday also notified a lawyer for Mark Meadows, Trump's former chief of staff, that Biden would waive any executive privilege that would prevent Meadows from co-operating with the committee, according to a letter obtained by The Associated Press.

The committee has subpoenaed Meadows and more than two dozen other people as part of its investigation.

His lawyer, George Terwilliger, issued a statement in response, saying Meadows "remains under the instructions of former President Trump to respect long-standing principles of executive privilege."

"It now appears the courts will have to resolve this conflict," Terwilliger said.


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Become a CBC Member

Join the conversation  Create account

Already have an account?