World

James Holmes trial: Jury selected in Aurora mass shooting trial

A jury was seated Tuesday in the death penalty trial of Colorado theater shooter James Holmes after a selection process that experts say was among the largest and most complicated in U.S. history.

Opening statements scheduled for April 27

Accused Aurora theater gunman James Holmes listens during his arraignment in Centennial, Colorado on March 12, 2013. (R.J. Sangosti/Pool/Reuters)

A union plumber, a school teacher and a survivor of the 1999 Columbine High School massacre were among the 19 women and five men chosen to serve as jurors in the death penalty trial of Colorado theatre shooter James Holmes.

The 12 jurors and 12 alternates were chosen Tuesday after a selection process that began Jan. 20, and which experts said was among the largest and most complicated in U.S. history.

The chosen jurors will report to court the afternoon of April 27 for opening statements.

Holmes is charged with killing 12 people and wounding 70 others in the July 2012 attack in suburban Denver. His attorneys don't dispute that he pulled the trigger but say he was in the grips of a psychotic episode when he slipped into the packed movie theatre and opened fire.

Jurors will decide whether he was legally insane at the time. If they find him guilty, they must also decide whether he should be put to death or sentenced to life in prison without parole.

 All 24 jurors will sit through the entire trial. Neither the group nor the public will know who is a primary juror and who is an alternate until the case is handed over for deliberations.

Also on the jury are a Denver Public Schools employee, a person with depression and a businesswoman who cares for her elderly parents.

One juror said during questioning, before she was chosen, that she was nervous what her community would think of her verdict.

The case is "big and serious, and it's going to have a huge impact on me and everyone else, the defendant and people in the community," she said. "They're not going to be directly involved, but they're going to be watching."

Attorneys on Tuesday questioned the 93 remaining jurors about their interpretations of the law, how they would gauge witnesses' and experts' credibility, and whether they could handle serving on such a high-profile trial.

Prosecution not required to deal with motive

District Attorney George Brauchler characterized it as a "four- to five-month roller coaster through the worst haunted house you can imagine."

He asked prospective jurors if they could serve even if they hear no evidence of a motive, since prosecutors are required to prove only the 165 charges against Holmes — not why they believe he committed the crimes.

Holmes's attorney, Tamara Brady, focused on perceptions of Holmes and whether the jury candidates could be objective given the litany of charges against him and the public scrutiny they will face. She asked how they felt listening for nearly two hours as Judge Carlos A. Samour Jr. read a list of the charges, including each victim's name. She wondered if prospective jurors would be too sympathetic to survivors.

She said she was nervous "about whether Mr. Holmes can get a fair trial in this case or whether it's just too big."

Potential jurors told attorneys they worry about what their neighbours might think if they reach an unpopular verdict and whether reporters would harass their families.

One man said he was reassured when the judge told him steps were taken to shield his identity. And many pledged they would not let their decision-making be influenced by concern about what others think.

Other candidates expressed trepidation about hearing graphic testimony and perhaps being overwhelmed by emotion.

Some prospective jurors have asked the judge why it has taken nearly three years for the case to come to trial.

Samour has said it's not an unusual amount of time for a trial this complex. The death penalty and insanity plea introduced complicated and time-consuming legal requirements.

After nearly three months, and almost three years since the mass shooting, the jurors were chosen from among hundreds who filled out written questionnaires, then returned for one-on-one sessions, where they were questioned about their views on the death penalty and mental illness. Court officials initially summoned an unprecedented 9,000 people.

Comments

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.