High stakes game in Sudan
Ethnic cleansing in Abyei region?
NAIROBI, KEYNA - It all went so well last January when Southern Sudanese cast their ballots in favour of separation. Perhaps too well.
There was a real joy among voters as they waited long hours in the baking sun. It's the kind of infectiously hopeful atmosphere you don't get to experience often as a reporter.
The Southern Sudanese are black Africans, most of them practise traditional African religions and Christianity. For decades, they have been second class citizens in their own country, paying with sometimes deadly consequences when they dared to rise up against an Islamist government which seems intent on assimilating all its citizens into a homogenous society in its own image.
Carolyn Dunn, CBC's Africa correspondent, has reported from Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Tanzania, South Africa, Sudan and Libya. Prior to this assignment, she was a national reporter on Parliament Hill and in Alberta. Dunn has had many other overseas assignments, including several tours in Afghanistan.
Imagine then, casting a ballot that would finally see them not conform as they had been told they must, but rather become their own country and determine their own fate for the first time.
None of the ominous forecasts of violence came to pass. Even Sudanese President, Omar al-Bashir, under great pressure from the international community, took on a resigned and even conciliatory tone in those days.
Peace agreement or 'lengthy ceasefire?'
It was a peace that would not last.
According to Fouad Hikmat, Sudan specialist with the International Crisis Group, what has happened since "reveals that the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement was nothing more than a lengthy ceasefire."
On May 19, Southern Sudan launched an attack that would change everything. United Nations peacekeepers were escorting about 200 Sudanese troops out of the Abyei region when they came under heavy ambush. The South's Sudan People's Liberation Army claimed the ambush was in response to a series of attacks by northern troops.
Most of them are of the Dinka Ngok tribe and are loyal to the South. At the same time, surveillance showed northern forces filling the Abyei area with a nomadic Arabic tribe called the Misseriya.
An internal report to the UN was strategically leaked to the media calling Khartoum's actions, "tantamount to ethnic cleansing."
Abyei has long been a flashpoint for disputes between northern and Southern Sudan. It is so contentious that is was purposely left out of January's independence referendum to try to avoid conflict.
Abyei sits on the north-south border and is often referred to as "oil rich." But, while its oilfields once contributed more than a quarter of Sudan's oil, production has declined and Abyei's oil field are believed to be nearing depletion.
Still, a key oil pipeline remains and as such is a key location for Sudan's oil export industry. Control of that pipeline is one reason why both northern and Southern Sudan would like to control Abyei.
The other reason is clearly ethnically based. The Arab Misseriya tribe has legal grazing rights in Abyei and claim the territory as their own. They are also fiercely loyal to Omar al-Bashir and his government in Khartoum. The Misseriya are a vital tribe to al-Bashir and his vision of Sudan as an wholly Islamist country.
Dinka Ngok on the other hand are decidedly Southern Sudanese. Southern Sudan's President Salva Kiir has publicly claimed Abyei as the land of the Dinka. Abyei symbolically represents the battle for several disputed border regions. Lands of people caught between two countries.
A Return to War?
Even as the days toward separation pass, there is still an overwhelming list of things to be decided.
Which side will win final control of Abyei and other disputed regions? How will oil revenues be split between the north and the south? How will Sudan's crushing debt be divided?
None of those questions have been answered since the referendum in January. It's unlikely they will be answered before the creation of South Sudan, as the new nation will be named, on July 9. In a climate of escalating violence some, like US Senator John Kerry, are warning Sudan is "ominously close to the precipice of war."
"These are tactical moves by the NCP to offset it being the underdog economic-wise and become the upper dog by putting themselves on the stronger side security wise," Hikmat theorizes.
The stakes for north and south
It is certainly a gamble for the al-Bashir government. There is a chance of reigniting a war with the south. But, the most likely consequence is that al-Bashir, already wanted by the International Criminal Court for genocide in the Darfur region, will completely alienate the international community.
For Southern Sudan, keeping the peace is an all or nothing proposition. It is a country starting essentially from scratch. And while it may enjoy a revenue stream from resources, building South Sudan will be done mostly out of the chequebooks of the international community. If it can keep the peace, billions of dollars will be poured into roads, schools, infrastructure and institution building.
Without peace, South Sudan could become a failed state even before its birth as a nation.