Alaska loses bid to kill wolves

A U.S. federal judge has denied the state of Alaska's request for a preliminary injunction allowing it to kill wolves, a step it said was needed to protect a caribou herd on an island in the Aleutian chain that is a subsistence food source for a Native village.

A U.S. federal judge has denied the state of Alaska's request for a preliminary injunction allowing it to kill wolves, a step it said was needed to protect a caribou herd on an island in the Aleutian chain that is a subsistence food source for a native village.

U.S. District Judge H. Russel Holland said Monday that while sympathetic to the state's argument, he had to abide by law when ruling against its request to immediately conduct predator control in the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge on Unimak Island.

The state argued that without emergency intervention, the Unimak Island caribou herd — the only island caribou herd in the United States — will continue to decline and die out if nothing is done.

But the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service argued it is bound by certain environmental laws that must be considered, and that takes time. In the meantime, it said it has been working with the state on the problem of the declining herd.

Caribou are an important food source for people living on the island, but herd numbers have dwindled from more than 1,200 in 2002 to about 400.

The state blames the problem on hungry wolves preying on caribou calves. It accuses the federal agency of unlawfully blocking its attempts to remove wolves from the herd's calving grounds.

The Alaska Department of Fish and Game had wanted to begin killing wolves on or about June 1 but backed off when the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service threatened to consider state biologists carrying out the operation as trespassers and vowed to go to the U.S. attorney if they went into the refuge to kill wolves.

The state filed a lawsuit on May 28 asking that the federal court clear the way for the killing of up to seven of the estimated 30 wolves on the island, the minimum number it has determined need to be removed to protect the herd.

The state said that if the operation doesn't start immediately, the chances to help this year's calves will be lost.

"The question is, can we do something now to help this herd from going over the cliff?" state lawyer Kevin Saxby asked the judge. "We are asking for your authority to keep it from taking the last step and plunging over the precipice."

But Department of Justice lawyer Dean Dunsmore said the agency does not consider the situation an emergency. He pointed out that the state informed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service less than six months ago that it believed the herd was in dire straits.

Saxby did not have immediate comment after the ruling, and it was unclear if the state would appeal.