Monkeys reward friends and relatives, scientists find
For some monkeys, it seems, it's better to both give and receive, than just to receive.
At least, that's what researchers at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center at Emory University in Atlanta have found.
Capuchin monkeys were given a choice of receiving a food reward, or receiving a food reward and also having another monkey receive food.
When paired with relative or "friend" the monkeys primarily went for the double reward, known as the "prosocial" choice, researchers say.
The research was led by Frans de Waal and reported in Tuesday's edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
"The fact the capuchins predominantly selected the prosocial option must mean seeing another monkey receive food is satisfying or rewarding for them," said de Waal.
But the monkeys weren't so generous with strangers, choosing the so-called "selfish" option instead.
"We believe prosocial behaviour is empathy based. Empathy increases in both humans and animals with social closeness, and in our study, closer partners made more prosocial choices. They seem to care for the welfare of those they know," de Waal said in a statement.
Now the question is whether giving is self-rewarding to capuchins because they can eat together, or if the monkeys simply like to see the other monkey enjoying the food.
In the study, eight adult female capuchins were given two tokens to exchange for food. One token would get them a slice of apple. The other would get an apple slice plus a similar slice for another monkey they could see.
In a series of tests, when the "partner" monkey was a relative or a familiar female from the same social group, the one choosing the token moved closer to the partner and primarily choose the prosocial token that got them both food. When the second monkey was a stranger, the selfish token was more likely to be chosen, often with the lead monkey turning her back to the stranger.
Since the reward was the same for the monkey making the choice, de Waal suggested there must be some intangible benefit to the prosocial choice, perhaps an indication of empathy.