Scientists believe they've found the oldest known Earth rock — on the moon

Almost 48 years after it was collected, scientists believe a rock sample taken during an Apollo mission to the moon originated from Earth roughly four billion years ago.

Fragment was likely ejected from Earth almost 4 billion years ago

An artist's rendering of the Hadean period Earth when the rock fragment found on the moon was formed. Impact craters, some flooded by shallow seas, cover large swaths of the Earth’s surface. The excavation of those craters ejected rocky debris, some of which hit the moon. (Simone Marchi)

Almost 48 years after it was collected, scientists believe a rock sample taken during an Apollo mission to the moon originated from Earth roughly four billion years ago.

From Apollo 11 — the first mission to land on the moon — to the final Apollo 17 mission, astronauts visiting the moon were tasked with many scientific objectives, including collecting rocks to bring back for analysis.

The team of scientists published their findings in the journal Earth and Planetary Science Letters and used new technology to study a two-gram sample of moon rock collected by the Apollo 14 astronauts in 1971. Their findings suggest that, instead of the rock originating on the moon, it came from Earth four billion years ago.

This is the rock fragment brought back by the Apollo 14 mission. Scientists analyzed its composition from a two-gram sample. (David A. Kring)

The researchers believe the rock sample is a type of felsite, which is composed of feldspar, quartz and a tiny bit of zircon. It's similar to granite, which is the type of rock that forms continents. Scientists believe it is produced through plate tectonics, the way Earth's outer crust moves. It is highly unusual to find it on the moon.

The findings suggest that the best explanation for the existence of that type of rock on the moon is that it's not from the moon at all. It's from Earth.

Surviving many blasts

Chemical analysis of the fragment revealed it had crystallized. The scientists suggest conditions on Earth just about 20 kilometres below the surface about four to 4.1 billion years ago, could have caused this process.

"It was confirmation that we had something granitic and that we had large enough impact events to launch things from the Earth," says co-author David A. Kring, principal investigator at the Center for Lunar Science and Exploration at the Lunar and Planetary Institute. "It's amazing that the rock survived."

It's amazing because this particular sample underwent three significant impacts. The solar system was rife with large bodies that were zipping around the sun as planets and moons were forming. Around this time — referred to the Late Heavy Bombardment Period — it's believed Earth was being blasted with debris.

Shortly after our planet's formation, several large bodies, such as an asteroid or comet, slammed into Earth, eventually displacing the rock and sending it into space. It reached the lunar surface. The moon would have been 2.8 times closer to Earth than it is today.

Once there, the theory goes, it survived subsequent impact events including one roughly 3.9 billion years ago, when a large impact partially melted the rock, and it likely was buried beneath the moon's surface in the Imbrium Basin.

The moon was much closer to Earth than it is today when the rock fragment was ejected. (LPI/David A. Kring)

But it wouldn't stay there.

There was another large impact in the region that sent the fragment roughly 200 kilometres from its landing location.

And finally, the researchers theorize that about 26 million years ago, an asteroid impacted the moon, creating the 340-metre diameter Cone Crater, bringing it back up to the surface where the astronauts found it.

A less likely explanation

There could be another explanation, albeit less likely, the scientists say.

The rock could have crystallized on the moon. However, it would have to have been 130 kilometres below the surface, which would place it in the moon's mantle, something that would require an entirely different understanding of the moon than we currently have.

Gordon (Oz) Osinski, director of the Canadian Lunar Research Network and professor at Western University's departments of earth sciences and physics and astronomy, believes the researchers' explanation is the most plausible.

"It's totally feasible, and there've been a few papers over the last several decades that this is possible, and this particular one, they definitely present some convincing evidence," he says.

"Hopefully this will spur interest in people looking at other similar [samples] in the Apollo collection."

Most of the rocks on Earth are younger than four billion years old, and both scientists say that, in order to determine how our planet formed, finding these older rocks is key.

With NASA's recent attention on returning humans to the moon, Kring hopes more samples will be collected. And that, he says, will help us learn about our early solar system, and thus, ourselves.

"The larger number of samples that we find, the better picture we'll paint of the early Earth," says Kring. "And I think all of us are interested in the origin and early evolution of our planet. And there's no doubt the best record of those processes are on the moon."


Nicole Mortillaro

Senior reporter, science

Based in Toronto, Nicole covers all things science for CBC News. As an amateur astronomer, Nicole can be found looking up at the night sky appreciating the marvels of our universe. She is the editor of the Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada and the author of several books. In 2021, she won the Kavli Science Journalism Award from the American Association for the Advancement of Science for a Quirks and Quarks audio special on the history and future of Black people in science. You can send her story ideas at


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Become a CBC Member

Join the conversation  Create account

Already have an account?