Why some coral reefs thrive as others die off
Management and ownership by local fishing communities appear to benefit reefs
Coral reefs in remote locations may sometimes be worse off than those near human fishing communities, says a new study that looked at why some reefs are thriving as others die off.
An international team of 39 scientists looked at the amount of fish at 2,514 coral reefs worldwide and tried to identify which ones had unexpectedly more or less fish than others, given the environmental and socioeconomic conditions nearby, such as the size of local populations and whether the reefs were in a marine reserve.
- Corals die when overfishing, pollution and climate change combine
- Coral reef at Amazon River's mouth surprises scientists
"We focused on the outliers, the places that were bucking the trend. And we looked for places that for all intents and purposes should have been degraded, but weren't," said Josh Cinner, lead author of the report in an interview with Nature, the journal that published the new research. Cinner is a professor of social science at James Cook University in Australia and at the ARC Centre for Excellence for Coral Reef Studies.
Fifteen reefs that were doing better than expected were identified as "bright spots," while 35 around the world doing worse than expected were identified as "dark spots."
In general, the researchers found that the bright spots, such as Karkar Island in Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, and parts of Indonesia, were places where the local community relied heavily on the fish that lived at the reef for food and had the power to manage it locally as a community.
They were also places where the fish had access to deeper waters where they could take refuge.
Rashid Sumaila, professor and director of the fisheries economics research unit at the University of British Columbia's fisheries centre, provided economic data and analysis about coral reefs around the world for the study.
He said when the local community has the power to manage a reef they rely on, they typically create a system to keep outsiders from fishing there.
There were also often traditional customs that protected the fish. For example, Cinner said, on Karkar Island, the community would sometimes temporarily close part of a reef for a period of time in preparation for a special feast.
On the other hand, some of the dark spots were in relatively remote places such as the northwestern Hawaiian Islands, where there is no local community to protect the fish.
"Then it's almost [a] free for all," Sumaila said.
In many such locations, fishermen used nets that could snag and damage reefs. They also had access to freezers, which gave an incentive to catch and store extra fish, depleting stocks.
Another factor was that reefs with dark spots had recently suffered an environmental shock, such as from a cyclone or from a rise in water temperatures that can bleach reefs. Many such shocks are occurring more frequently as a result of human-caused climate change.
With files from Reuters
To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.
By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.
Become a CBC Account Holder
Join the conversation Create account
Already have an account?