Politics

Senate passes environmental assessment bill

A pair of controversial environmental bills, including the environmental assessment bill, scaled their final hurdle in the Senate on Thursday over the objections of critics who warn the two pieces of legislation will kneecap Canada's oil industry and fuel separatist sentiment in Alberta.

Divisive measure overhauls assessment process for major construction projects

Pro-pipeline supporters protest against Bill C-69 in Calgary in April. On Thursday, the Senate passed the environmental assessment measure, which overhauls the assessment process for major construction projects. (Jeff McIntosh/Canadian Press)

A pair of controversial environmental bills, including the environmental assessment bill, scaled their final hurdle in the Senate on Thursday over the objections of critics who warn the two pieces of legislation will kneecap Canada's oil industry and fuel separatist sentiment in Alberta.

Senators passed Bill C-69, which overhauls the federal environmental assessment process for major construction projects, by a vote of 57-37. 

C-69 imposes more requirements for consulting affected Indigenous communities, widens public participation in the review process and requires climate change to be considered when major national resource-exploitation and transportation projects are being evaluated.

The Senate made more than 200 amendments to that bill earlier this month, but the government accepted only 99 of them, mostly to do with reducing ministerial discretion to intervene in the review process.

"I'm really proud of this legislation," said Environment Minster Catherine McKenna on Friday morning ahead of a cabinet retreat in Quebec. "It's going to be great for investor confidence in our country to know we have a system that works."

"If you do not respect the rights of Indigenous Peoples, if you do not protect the environment, if you do not listen to concerns, good projects simply will not go ahead." 

Conservative Sen. Richard Neufeld called C-69 "one of the most toxic, polarizing and divisive bills" he's encountered in 10 years as a senator.

They also approved — just barely — Bill C-48, legislation barring oil tankers from loading at ports on the northern coast of British Columbia. That bill passed on a vote of 49-46, only narrowly escaping defeat.

The two bills have together become a flashpoint between the Liberals and Conservatives over how Canada can protect the environment without driving investment away from the fossil-fuel sector.

"This is a sad day for Canada. With the passage of Bill C-69, Justin Trudeau finally has his law that will phase out Canada's oil and gas industry," said Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer in a statement.
 
"This has been Trudeau's objective all along, to eliminate the industry and the hundreds of thousands of Canadians who rely on it for their livelihoods. He told Canadians on Jan. 13, 2017, that he wanted to 'phase out' the oil sands, and Bill C-69 is how he will do it."

The two bills also put to the test senators' policy of generally bowing to the will of the elected House of Commons when there is a dispute between the two parliamentary chambers about legislation.

The pair were among a long list of bills the Senate pounded through late into the night Thursday as the chamber prepared to adjourn for the summer and the subsequent election.

The House of Commons suspended its sitting earlier in the day on a sombre note, with MPs delivering condolences following the death of Conservative MP Mark Warawa.

But Canadians haven't heard the last about the pair of bills. They're both destined to be fodder for Liberals and Conservatives on the campaign trail to this fall's election.

Conservative Sen. David Tkachuk said the government has done resource-dependent communities in Alberta and Saskatchewan a "disservice" by rejecting the Senate's amendments to C-69.

"Mark my words," he warned, "these people will let them know exactly how they feel this October."

No oil tankers north of Vancouver Island

Bill C-48 imposes a moratorium on oil tankers north of Vancouver Island. The government accepted a Senate amendment requiring a mandatory review of the tanker ban in five years.

The Senate committee that reviewed the bill recommended in May the entire Senate vote down the bill in its entirety, but that didn't happen, leading Conservatives to accuse the Independent senators who make up a majority in the chamber of being Liberals in disguise.

Conservative Sen. Michael MacDonald was one of a few from his caucus to make final pleas with his colleagues to not proceed with the bill.

He said it "will be devastating for the Alberta and Saskatchewan economies."

However, several Independent senators rose to speak in favour of the bill, including Yukon Independent Sen. Pat Duncan.

"I believe we should be doing it," said Duncan.

Ontario Sen. Donna Dasko, who was on the committee that studied the bill in the Senate, said she thinks "it is quite a good bill."

Conservative Sen. Dennis Patterson, a former premier of the Northwest Territories, said after the bill passed that it would "... not actually ban tankers from the Hecate Strait; it simply landlocks Alberta and Saskatchewan oil, and destroys the possibility of economic development in northern Indigenous communities."


CBC Politics' new weekly Canada Votes newsletter

Get analysis from our Parliamentary bureau as we count down to the federal election. Delivered to your inbox every Sunday evening – then daily during the campaign. Sign up here.

With files from CBC News

Comments

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.