RCMP refugee screening a $16M flop, says internal report

The Conservative government handed the RCMP $16 million in 2011-12 so refugee claimants' names could be checked against domestic police databases, in a bid to weed out potential terrorists. Four years later, the project was shut down after it failed to provide any useful information to the Canada Border Services Agency.

Pilot project to run the names of refugee claimants through police databases generated little of value

Syrian refugees in Vancouver prepare for a tour to meet prospective employers. A new report suggests a $16-million RCMP project to screen some refugees in Canadian police databases was a failure after four years. (Denis Dossmann/CBC)

A $16-million RCMP project to help keep dangerous refugees out of Canada has turned out to be an expensive security flop.

An internal evaluation says the screening project delivered information too late, strayed beyond its mandate, and in the end did almost nothing to catch refugees who might be linked to criminal or terrorist groups.

Meanwhile, 30 Mounties were tied up for four years on duties that did little to enhance Canada's security.

Then prime minister Stephen Harper said in Welland, Ont., on Sept. 9, 2015, that Canada needed to proceed cautiously in taking in refugees from war zones because they had to be properly screened for criminal and terrorism links. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)
"The current approach does not appear to provide much by way of relevant information to support the admissibility screening of refugee claimants," concludes the Sept. 29, 2015, report, obtained by CBC News under the Access to Information Act.

The report on the anemic results was completed at about the same time as then prime minister Stephen Harper said Canada had to proceed cautiously in accepting Syrian refugees so that Canada's screening process could weed out terrorists.

"When we are dealing with people that are from, in many cases, a terrorist war zone, we are going to make sure that we screen people appropriately and the security of this country is fully protected," Harper told a 2015 election rally in Welland, Ont.

"We cannot open the floodgates and airlift tens of thousands of refugees out of a terrorist war zone without proper process. That is too great a risk for Canada."

Domestic databases checked

The RCMP screening pilot was launched in 2011-12 as part of a package of Conservative reforms tightening up the processing of refugees, including a controversial move to withdraw some medical treatments for rejected asylum seekers. The Liberals have since reversed that measure.

Under the pilot project, the RCMP vetted potential refugees already in Canada — the names were provided by the Canada Border Services Agency — by checking domestic police databases for links to criminal or terrorist organizations, among other things.

But the auditors found a raft of problems:

  • RCMP officers hired for the work couldn't get started for months because legislation was slow to be passed in 2012.
  • The border agency and RCMP computers couldn't talk to each other, so the organizations had to exchange thousands of names manually.
  • The cost per screening skyrocketed from a planned $425 to $1,026, on average.
  • The RCMP delivered screening checks to the border agency too late about a third of the time, rendering them useless because of refugee-decision deadlines.
  • The RCMP reported only 85 of 4,085 names as potential problem refugees, the auditors said, based on a significant sample of the completed work. But the border agency used only two of those names in its vetting process because of late or inadequate information from the Mounties. And even the information on the two names was later found not to be pertinent to the border agency's final decision.
  • The RCMP pilot began poorly by primarily vetting the names of refugee claimants who were brand-new to Canada — and therefore were unlikely to have a Canadian criminal record.

The report notes that under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, three specific kinds of activity render individuals inadmissible, such as spying, violating human rights or participating in organized criminal activity. The RCMP, however, kept reporting other kinds of "adverse" activities that were irrelevant to the refugee-screening process.

In the end, the auditors said the RCMP's work over four years likely had no bearing on the vetting carried out by border agency officers, who had access to other sources — including fingerprint databases — and apparently did competent risk-assessments on their own. The pilot project was shut down March 31, 2015.

'Evidence-based policy'

A spokeswoman for the RCMP, Annie Delisle, said the pilot was "implemented as intended: the RCMP established a process within its organization to screen a portion of the refugee claimants against existing law enforcement databases."

But Delisle acknowledged that "the results of the pilot project demonstrated that this screening process did not significantly contribute to the CBSA screening process to warrant further implementation."

RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson says the Mounties have had to divert resources away from other key activities to beef up anti-terror efforts. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)
A spokesman for Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale, who is responsible for the RCMP, said the government welcomes the evaluation's feedback.

"We believe in evidence-based policy and in ensuring that government resources are being used effectively and responsibly," Scott Bardsley said in an email.

RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson has said the force's new responsibilities for anti-terrorism have drained resources away from other key activities, such as fighting organized crime and market fraud.

Follow @DeanBeeby on Twitter


Dean Beeby

Senior reporter, Parliamentary Bureau

Dean Beeby is a CBC journalist, author and specialist in freedom-of-information laws. Follow him on Twitter: @DeanBeeby


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Become a CBC Account Holder

Join the conversation  Create account

Already have an account?