RCMP gun registry data destruction allegations handed to police

Allegations of RCMP wrongdoing related to the illegal destruction of long run registry records have been referred to the police for investigation.

Files sent to Ontario Provincial Police by Public Prosecution Service

The Conservative government wants national long-gun registry data walled off from requests under Access to Information Act, a move the information commissioner warns could set a concerning precedent. ((Paul Chiasson/Canadian Press))

Allegations of RCMP wrongdoing related to the illegal destruction of long run registry records have been referred to the police for investigation.

It's the latest twist in an unprecedented battle between the Conservative government and an independent officer of parliament whose job is to safeguard Canadians' access to government records.

The Harper government responded by retroactively rewriting the law, backdating the changes and burying the amendment in an omnibus budget bill it introduced earlier this month.

Information Commissioner Suzanne Legault calls that a "perilous precedent" that could be used by governments to retroactively rewrite laws on everything from spending scandals to electoral fraud.

File handed over to OPP

While the Conservatives press ahead with an omnibus bill that will retroactively erase the offence from the books, Justice Minister Peter MacKay's office has confirmed that it sent Legault's findings to the Public Prosecution Service of Canada last week, which in turn handed the file over to an investigative agency.

The Ontario Provincial Police did not return messages Tuesday but The Canadian Press has learned it was the police force contacted.

"The Attorney General of Canada is not responsible for laying charges," MacKay's spokeswoman Clarissa Lamb said in an email Tuesday.

The public prosecutor's office would only say that it has passed on the file.

"We don't direct an investigation," said spokesman Dan Brien.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has said the Mounties were just respecting the will of Parliament when they destroyed gun records that were subject to an active access-to-information request and investigation by the information commissioner.

However the events in question took place before a Conservative bill to end the now-defunct, long-gun registry had been passed by the House of Commons in April 2012.

To cover the RCMP's tracks, the government's most recent budget bill exempts all long gun registry records from the Access to Information Act, as well as any investigations, complaints or judicial proceedings related to those records — and backdates the changes to October 2011, when the bill to end the long gun registry was first introduced in Parliament.

'Staggering on a number of levels'

That's cause for a parliamentary investigation, the official Opposition NDP said Tuesday and they're requesting that the Commons ethics committee study the matter.

"It doesn't matter what party you're in, the issue of being able to retroactively change laws to protect a government agency or department that was involved in illegally shredding documents would set a very, very dangerous precedent for future governments," New Democrat Charlie Angus, a member of the committee on access to information, privacy and ethics, said in an interview.

"This is staggering on a number of levels."

NDP MP Charmaine Borg's motion for the ethics committee requests that the Justice Department produce "all of its documents relating to this case" and that Justice Minister Peter MacKay, Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney and RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson be called to testify.

Retroactive changes to access law

A spokesman for Blaney would not say Tuesday whether the minister would agree to attend committee hearings on what he called a "technical amendment."

"The will of Parliament has been made clear; all copies of the registry were to be destroyed," Jeremy Laurin said in an email.

Patricia Davidson, the Conservative vice-chair of the ethics committee, was not immediately available for comment.

However, Scott Simms, the Liberal vice-chair of the ethics committee, said the committee has just completed a study on identity theft and has an opening to take on new business, although time is tight.

The Commons is set to rise for the summer recess by June 23 and won't likely return before Canadians go to the polls to elect a new government in October.

Simms said he'd like to hear from the information commissioner.

"This is not about the gun registry, really," he said. "It's about access to information and retroactivity associated with it."

Liberals to propose motion as well

Simms said he has many questions about the precedent-setting move.

"I doubt if I'll ever get to ask them — unless the Conservatives feel like talking about the gun registry is good for them again," he said.

The Liberals are also making a formal move to hear from Legault, Blaney and RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson. Liberal MP Wayne Easter will put forward a motion to the Public Safety committee calling for all three to be heard "urgently" in light of Legault's latest report.

The NDP's Angus says what's at stake is the power of government to effectively neuter independent parliamentary watchdogs while giving itself the power to rewrite history to negate criminal charges.

"This isn't inside-the-bubble bickering," said Angus. "These are the institutions that are supposed to have the power to ensure that parliamentarians and government remain honest."

Files from Rosemary Barton


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.