Ottawa adds national security risk assessments to federal research grant applications

The federal government is setting new guidelines that work national security considerations into funding criteria for university research.

Security checks on scientific research getting renewed attention after 2 scientists fired

Innovation Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne says research projects must now undergo a risk assessment as part of grant applications to the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. (The Canadian Press)

The federal government is setting new guidelines that work national security considerations into funding criteria for university research in a bid to shield intellectual property from foreign actors.

Effective immediately, research projects must undergo a risk assessment as part of any grant application to the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) that involves private-sector partners, Innovation Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne said Monday.

The research council will then assess and work to mitigate any risk alongside national security agencies and departments on a case-by-case basis, he said.

"The agencies will form a view, and for the partnerships that are deemed high risk, they will not be funded," Champagne said in an interview Monday, citing fields from aerospace to artificial intelligence and quantum computing.

The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and the Communications Security Establishment — the country's cyberspy agency — will play a key role in the risk assessment, he said.

Security questions around scientific research have drawn renewed attention after two scientists were escorted from the high-security National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg in July 2019 and then fired in January this year.

One of the employees had earlier been responsible for a shipment of Ebola and Henipah viruses to China's Wuhan Institute of Virology, though the Public Health Agency of Canada has said that event is unrelated to their dismissal.

Champagne did not directly address the incident, which involved government employees rather than university researchers, but warned of "foreign interference or unwanted knowledge transfer that could contribute to the advancement of foreign militaries or other types of activities, which could harm the national security of Canada."

"The framework in play will certainly provide us with tools in order to better assess who our researchers are planning to partner with," Champagne said.

CSIS has warned repeatedly that foreign governments and state-sponsored groups are looking to poach patents and tightly guarded information from Canadian companies and institutions.

Agency director David Vigneault said in February that China is undermining Canada through its efforts to steal valuable technology and silence critics of Beijing's policies.

Champagne, who was previously the foreign affairs minister, was careful not to call out any countries, but he did point to previous CSIS publications.

A view by drone of the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg on Wednesday, June 9, 2021. (Trevor Lyons/Radio-Canada)

Its annual report in April highlighted the potential "loss of sensitive and proprietary information or leading-edge technologies" to foreign states such as China and Russia, which continue to target "non-governmental organizations in Canada — including academic institutions, the private sector, and civil society."

A working group composed of three federal departments, two security agencies and eight other organizations representing researchers and universities formed in 2018 — before the duo was escorted out of the Winnipeg lab — to promote practices that protect Canadian research data and intellectual property, Champagnenoted.

The working group helped develop the new criteria, dubbed the National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships.

The new rules follow similar moves in countries such as the United States and Australia.

Champagne acknowledged that institutions have asked about the possibility of red-tape bottlenecks for researchers whose applications will funnel through spy agencies before receiving a stamp of approval.

The lead-up to the fresh framework, which has roots in workshops on research safeguards dating back to 2016, has helped clear a path for the current guidelines that will steer clear of backlogs, he said.

The Innovation Department plans to expand the new guidelines beyond NSERC's Alliance grant program to all granting councils and the Canada Foundation for Innovation "in the near term."

Add some “good” to your morning and evening.

A variety of newsletters you'll love, delivered straight to you.

Sign up now


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Become a CBC Account Holder

Join the conversation  Create account

Already have an account?