NDP motion demands Conservatives hold public hearings for Elections Act

New Democrats are accusing the Conservatives of trying to rig federal election rules while clouding criticism of the proposed changes as just another battle in the Ottawa bubble.

New Democrats introduced a motion Monday for committee to take public hearings on the road

Question Period Express, Feb. 24 RAW

8 years ago
Duration 5:25
Opposition Leader Tom Mulcair and Democratic Reform Minister Pierre Poilievre square off on the Fair Elections Act.

New Democrats are accusing the Conservatives of trying to rig federal election rules while clouding criticism of the proposed changes as just another battle in the Ottawa bubble.

The NDP, backed by the Liberals, wants a House of Commons committee to hold hearings across the country on proposed changes to the Elections Act.

NDP Leader Tom Mulcair demanded to know Monday why Conservatives approved Senate committee travel 25 times over the past year but won't let elected MPs take their Elections Act hearings on the road.

"We're talking about the rules for a federal general election," Mulcair thundered during the daily question period.

"That's the foundation of our democracy. That's what they're trying to cheat on."

Mulcair was admonished by Speaker Andrew Scheer for his language but immediately repeated the allegation.

"I can affirm that we all know they're trying to cheat in advance," Mulcair shouted.

NDP deputy leader David Christopherson has introduced a motion that would instruct the Conservative-dominated committee to take the hearings on the road and complete them by May 1.

Christopherson says the government is resisting the idea because it wants to make the fight over election rules just another "battle in the bubble" that Canadians can easily tune out.

Pierre Poilievre, the minister for democratic reform, spoke to the bill's merits in the House but did not say why travelling committee hearings were a bad idea.

Poilievre said the committee can invite testimony and put together a long list of what he called the best experts in the field. 

But Christopherson argues that people deserve a say on how elections are conducted and should be able to make their opinions known in their home regions.

Public hearings 'a big delaying tactic,' Tory MP says

The major overhaul of elections rules was drafted without the usual opposition consultations or formal input from Elections Canada, the watchdog that oversees election fairness.

Kevin Lamoureux, a Liberal MP who sits on the committee that will examine the legislation, called the way it was drafted "an absolute and total disgrace."

However Conservative MP Michelle Rempel responded that the move to hold hearings on electoral reform outside Ottawa seems like a big delaying tactic.

The legislative overhaul was scheduled to be introduced in Parliament last April but was pulled at the last minute after Conservative MPs privately objected to some of the proposed provisions.

The bill finally tabled Feb. 4 effectively splits Elections Canada in two by putting its investigative powers in a separate office.

While placing new restrictions on automated robocalls during campaigns, the bill does not give Elections Canada the added investigative powers it was seeking to get to the bottom of the widespread fraudulent phone campaign of the 2011 election.

It also restricts the chief electoral officer from communicating with Canadians and effectively increases the amount parties will be able to spend during campaigns.

Chief Electoral Officer Marc Mayrand has questioned the proposed changes, fearing they will undermine Elections Canada's efforts to encourage people to vote.


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Become a CBC Member

Join the conversation  Create account

Already have an account?