Outgoing MPs can expect financial windfall, even if they plan their exit

Losing an election can be a bitter political blow, but generous severance pay for departing MPs helps soften the landing. MPs are eligible for a lump-sum payment equal to six months’ salary — awarded whether the politician was defeated or simply chose not to seek re-election.

A golden handshake: departing MPs entitled to 6 months' severance pay

Outgoing MPs (left to right): Peter MacKay, Shelly Glover, James Moore and Christian Paradis can expect a golden handshake on their way out thanks to generous severance packages. (CBC)

Losing an election can be a bitter political blow, but generous payouts to departing MPs might help soften the landing.

Under House of Commons rules, members of Parliament are eligible for a lump sum payment equal to six months' salary. And the severance pay is awarded whether the politician was defeated in a campaign — or voluntarily chose not to seek re-election.

The annual pay for an MP is now set at $167,400, which means an outgoing member would receive a golden handshake of $83,700.

Those with extra duties are eligible for a sizable top-up. For a minister of state, that figure would climb to $113,700.

A cabinet minister, House Speaker, or Opposition leader would be eligible for $123,750 and a prime minister would be in line for $167,400.

Pension can supersede severance

If MPs are at least 55 years old and have six years' service, they are eligible for a pension instead of severance.

Five sitting cabinet ministers have bowed out of politics: Christian Paradis, Shelly Glover, James Moore and Peter MacKay. John Baird left politics in February.

Aaron Wudrick, national director of the Canadian Taxpayers' Federation, said there is "something odd" about politicians collecting severance when they choose not to seek re-election.

"It is a planned departure. Severance is intended to help tide over people who are thrown out of work unexpectedly, which is arguably the case for people who are defeated in an election.… their intention is to continue working, but the voters fire them," he said. "But if you know in advance you are not running again, you have time to plan, so it is not clear why there should be a similar entitlement to severance."

Wudrick said the compensation system was designed for a time when there were no fixed elections and a limited ability to plan.

"Now that we have fixed election dates, it may be time to review the compensation system," he said.

Incumbent MPs also remain on the payroll throughout the campaign period, even if they aren't running for re-election. The same goes for political staffers, who receive two months' pay, plus two weeks' pay for the first year of service, and one week's pay for every year after that if they lose their job.

Politics is a 'risky job'

Penny Collenette, a law professor at the University of Ottawa and former Liberal political staffer, said there is a "higher rationale" for compensating those who are defeated, which is akin to a public and often humiliating "firing."

"They're making the effort to serve the public, but it's a risky job," she said.

Duff Conacher, co-founder of Democracy Watch, said the public should not be on the hook for severance when the former politician begins collecting a paycheque from a new job.

"As soon as they have a new source of income, it should stop," he said.


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.