Metal-on-metal hip implants since 2006 may be more likely to fail: study

Tens of thousands of people worldwide who had metal-on-metal hip replacements may need further surgery because of the high failure rate of the implants, British researchers say.

'Unacceptably high revision rate' found for DePuy Pinnacle device, U.K. surgeons say

Tens of thousands of people worldwide who had metal-on-metal hip replacements may need further surgery because of the high failure rate of the devices, British researchers say.

The researchers focused on the DePuy Pinnacle device. It has a metal ball that serves as the top of the thigh bone and sits inside a metal liner that acts as a replacement socket.  

Some people who've received metal-on-metal hip replacements may need them removed and replaced, according to U.K researchers. (Charlie Riedel/Associated Press)

In Canada, some metal-on-metal hip implants have been recalled.

Writing in Thursday's BMJ Open, Dr. David Langton of University Hospital of North Tees in Stockton, U.K., and his co-authors reviewed the progress of 243 women and 191 men who had 489 metal-on-metal Pinnacle hip replacements in northern England and combined the patient data with national registry data. 

The patients were monitored for an average of 7.5 years after surgery.

In total, 71 hips needed to be surgically removed and replaced.

"This device was found to have an unacceptably high revision rate," researchers said.

By combining the high failure rate and extrapolating from the company's sales records, the team learned 180,000 patients globally have had the implant. These people might be a risk for early revisions, they said.

Use of metal-on-metal hips has gone down over the past five years.

Implants from 2006 on showed higher risk of revision compared with those manufactured before 2006, which the researchers speculate could be due to manufacturing variations between batches.

Mindy Tinsley, a spokeswoman for Depuy, said there were no manufacturing problems as the study suggests.  Measurements taken at the company's U.K. manufacturing facility showed all liners were within specification. 

"We question the validity of the Langton paper given significant flaws with how it was conducted, the limited data reported, and the clear conflicts of interest of some of its authors. The paper is also inconsistent with the results of many peer-reviewed studies that were conducted with more scientific rigour and transparency," she said in an emailed statement. 

In the study, wear rates of the metal surfaces retrieved from patients was generally low.

One of the limitations of the research is that not all patients attended the followup clinics. Those who didn't were assumed to have no symptoms. 

There was no specific grants for the research. Some of the authors are retained as experts for plaintiffs in ongoing litigation about metal-on-metal implants. 


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.