Metrolinx expropriates Toronto family's Eglinton Ave. property

A Toronto property owner was stunned to find provincial transit body Metrolinx plans to take possession of his property this summer for construction of the Eglinton Crosstown LRT. The transit planning body says it tried to contact him, but resorted to putting a notice in the newspaper.

Ian Young said he was never contacted by Metrolinx, which says letters went unanswered

Metrolinx mix-up

8 years ago
Duration 2:57
A Toronto property owner is wondering how Metrolinx couldn't get a hold of him, and instead announced its plans to expropriate his Eglinton Avenue building in a local newspaper

A Toronto property owner was stunned to find out that Metrolinx, the provincial transit body, plans to take possession of his property this summer. 

Metrolinx recently placed a notice of expropriation in a local newspaper, which is normally a last resort when the owners can't be located. The commercial property at 1565 Eglinton Ave. W., near Dufferin Street, is near the construction site for the Oakwood station of the Eglinton Crosstown LRT.

The owners of the building, which is home to a barber shop, are listed as Oswald and Maureen Young. Oswald has died, but Maureen is alive and living with her son, Ian, who said he has never heard from Metrolinx. 

"It's quite shocking actually," Young said. He heard about the expropriation when a CBC news reporter reached out to him. 

"If CBC can get in touch with me ... [Metrolinx is] a lot bigger than the CBC, so they should have no problem getting in touch with me."

Toronto lawyer Stephen D'Agostino said he finds the case unusual. 

Lawyer Stephen D'Agostino said an expropriation notice is more common if a property owner has moved away or neglected the property, not when there's an active business on-site. (Makda Ghebreslassie/CBC News)

"In a situation where you're dealing with a piece of land, for example, where the owner has moved away, where there's been neglect of the property, that sort of thing you might expect a newspaper notice," D'Agostino said. "But not when there's an active business on the property."

A spokesperson for Metrolinx said several attempts were made to contact the owner by registered mail, but the letters were returned. A judge can still move the date of expropriation, and Young has hired a lawyer. 

Metrolinx's ad states the agency requires possession by August 17, but doesn't say what the property will be used for. 

Barbershop's future unclear

A barbershop employee said he was told only the sidewalk would be affected during the construction. 

"If the sidewalk is obstructed where you can see whether or not this business is in operation, it will be very hard for us to generate any revenue from people walking in from the street," said Dail Polius. 

The chair of the Business Improvement Area said he isn't surprised there's confusion and that Metrolinx needs to do a better job of communicating its plans with the local community.

"We continue to ask what information we can get to better understand what potential future impact there's going to be," said Nick Alampi, chair of the Eglinton-York BIA.

"It's not being given to us as quickly as we would like, so we can know what the next three, four, six months are going to be like."