Toronto

Peel District School Board takes new approach to teaching To Kill a Mockingbird

Some Canadian writers are applauding an Ontario school board that has mandated To Kill A Mockingbird only be taught through a critical "anti-oppression lens."

Memo asks teachers choosing to use novel in lesson plans to use critical eye

A Peel District School Board memo indicates that if teachers choose to use To Kill a Mockingbird in their lesson plans, it should be done with a critical eye.

Some Canadian writers are applauding an Ontario school board that has mandated To Kill A Mockingbird only be taught through a critical "anti-oppression lens."

The authors say it's important for students to see their identities reflected in the material they learn in English class.

The Peel District School Board says it wants to expose students to texts from diverse authors on race and injustice in an effort to update its English curriculum, and sent a memo to English department heads and principals telling them as much.

The memo indicates that if teachers choose to use Harper Lee's classic novel in their lesson plans, it should be done with a critical eye.

The novel was published in 1960 and explores racial inequality in a small Alabama town through the trial of a black man falsely accused of raping a white woman, as told from the perspective of his white lawyer's family.

African-Canadian poet George Elliott Clarke says texts taught to students about racism should have main characters of colour because that validates and centralizes their experiences of oppression.

Poleen Grewal, the school board's associate director of instructional and equity support services, sent the memo and says the novel will be taught to explore the impact of how racism is portrayed by a white author and how that leaves out the perspectives of those who have actually experienced racism.

Chinese-Canadian writer Wayson Choy says he agrees that To Kill a Mockingbird should be taught with a more critical approach and in context, since racism is discussed differently today than it was more than 50 years ago.

Comments

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

now