City staff decide not to go out on a limb for 250-year-old red oak
No deal in sight after three months of fruitless talks
It appears the city's oldest tree won't be getting its own park, after all.
The red oak that sits in the back yard of 76 Coral Gables Dr. in North York is estimated to be at least 250 years old.
- This 6-year-old girl is raising funds to save a majestic Toronto oak tree
- 'It's like a cathedral': Toronto votes to save what could be city's oldest tree
City council voted last summer to buy the the property, and raze the house. The land would then be turned into a park with the tree as its centrepiece.
But in a report made public Tuesday, city staff say negotiations are going nowhere and should be abandoned.
"Staff have negotiated with the property owner over an approximate span of three months and were unable to agree on a purchase price for the property," the report states. "As a result, Real Estate Services, the Toronto Office of Partnerships, and Parks, Forestry and Recreation are in agreement to cease pursuing the acquisition of the property."
"I'm really upset now," Edith George, a neighbour who has spearheaded the effort to have the city acquire the tree, said on hearing the news Tuesday.
"You just ruined my whole day."
The tree's cultural significance has been recognized by the provincial government's Heritage Tree Program, and George said she has applied to have it protected by the federal government as a national historic site.
"The stories that this tree could tell of the history of our country," she said. "And shame on the city."
The councillor for the area, Anthony Perruzza said he was disappointed in the outcome. But he said the city was in a tough situation, because it was well known that councillors wanted to buy the property for parkland.
"If you have a person on one side who sees the city has a direction to buy this tree, you might be willing to hold out and say 'I can get a little more,'" Perruzza said.
"There's obviously a limit."
The homeowner's realtor, Waleed Khaled Elsayed, wouldn't discuss details of the negotiations, but said the city's decision "saddens me.
"It's disappointing. I'll reconvene with the seller and we'll figure out what our plans are moving forward."
The city staff report goes to the general government and licensing committee March 5, and to city council later next month.