Sterilization of indigenous women an act of genocide, new book says
Policy makers believed it was 'cheaper to intervene and stop people from reproducing', author says
An Act of Genocide, Colonialism and the Sterilization of Aboriginal Women was written by Karen Stote, an assistant professor of women and gender studies at Wilfred Laurier University in Ontario.
She documents 580 sterilizations of indigenous women that took place at federal hospitals between 1971 and 1974. The hospital in Moose Factory, Ont. conducted 147 of them. The Sioux Lookout, Ont. hospital is responsible for 61.
"Evidence indicates this practice was carried out by eugenically minded doctors in Ontario and northern Canada, where aboriginal women were the prime targets," Stote writes.
Other vulnerable populations were subject to sexual sterilization, but indigenous people are disproportionately represented in the statistics, she said.
Preventing indigenous women from getting pregnant was a means of limiting government responsibilities, Stote told CBC News.
"As long as indigenous women continue to reproduce there will continue to be indigenous people and indigenous people directly connected to lands and to aboriginal rights," she said.
Beyond sterilization, historic documents revealed that population control was on the mind of policy makers even before birth control was available as a contraceptive in Canada, Stote said.
"In the early 1960s, federal officials were talking about distributing birth control in indigenous communities as a good idea because it would help reduce the size of the the homes that need to be provided to aboriginal people," she said.
Health professionals rarely received informed consent for sterilizations that took place in federal hospitals, she said.
Some of the same attitudes that led to the interference in the fertility of indigenous mothers in the past, are still prevalent today, Stote said.
"People always say to me, 'well people shouldn't have children they can't afford'," she said. "But colonialism created situations such that some people are forced to live in poverty.
"It's a lot cheaper to intervene and stop people from reproducing than it is to address that larger society," she said.