Would scrapping Safe Third Country Agreement lead to influx of asylum seekers? Not necessarily.
Trump administration's hard line on immigration has prompted calls for reform of Canada-U.S. deal
The Trump administration's crackdown on asylum seekers has renewed calls by critics to scrap or suspend the Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA); arguing that the U.S. is no longer a hospitable destination for refugee claimants.
But that raises the question about whether more asylum seekers would then come into Canada.
"The answer is that it's speculative and no one knows," said Peter Showler, former chair of the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) of Canada.
But, he adds: "I don't think there's a reasonable assumption that there would be a significant increase."
Under the STCA, a person must make their refugee claim in the first, so-called "safe country" they reach. The premise of the deal was that since Canada and the U.S. share similar values, both are safe countries for those seeking refugee status.
It means those who first arrive in the U.S. and then seek entry to Canada to make a refugee claim will likely be turned back. (There are a few exceptions, for example, if the claimant has a family member in Canada.)
Yet thousands of asylum seekers have recently crossed into Canada thanks to a loophole in the STCA, which applies only to those who try to enter by train, at airports or at official land border crossings. It doesn't apply if — as so many people have in Quebec, Manitoba and elsewhere — one just walks across the border at some unofficial, unguarded spot.
Some suggest that scrapping the STCA would lead to more asylum seekers coming to Canada, because, that way, they could go to any official port of entry without the risk of being sent back to the U.S. or facing, what can be at times, a dangerous journey to cross the border, depending on the season and terrain.
Last year, more than 20,000 asylum seekers crossed illegally into Canada, according to the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA).
Trump has taken a hard stand against illegal immigrants, referring to them as "invaders." His administration was slammed for the controversial policy of separating children from parents arrested for crossing illegally from Mexico. And on Monday, he said those caught crossing illegally should be immediately sent back without appearing before a judge.
His stance has sparked calls from human rights activists, refugee lawyers and Canadian politicians to scrap the STCA.
But Showler says there are approximately 11 million to 12 million illegal residents in the U.S. Many are fully aware of the relatively easy irregular or illegal ways to enter Canada, he said.
- Canadian officials to counter 'incomplete' information in flyers with tips on illegal border crossing
Yet despite Trump's crackdown, there have not been huge increases of people crossing the border illegally, he said.
"That could have triggered a large movement toward Canada, and it didn't," Showler said.
Many have established roots in the U.S., have been there for decades, have families, driver's licences and Social Security cards and aren't likely to come into Canada just because it would be easy, he said.
'Moderate noticeable uptick'
In a report released last year, Fleeing to Canada on Foot: Reviewing the Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement, program associate Benn Proctor of the Canada Institute of the Wilson Centre, a global affairs think tank, noted that the agreement has "significantly reduced" the costs to Canada from processing claimants by dissuading applicants to come to Canada.
For example, in 2005, the year after STCA took effect, the CBSA reported that the number of claims made at the border dropped 54 per cent, from 8,904 to 4,041.
Proctor found that during the 11 years after STCA was implemented, Canada has processed an annual average of 22,839 asylum claims, 23 per cent fewer than the annual average of 29,682 claims processed between 1989 and 2004.
The OECD estimates a cost of $14,000 per asylum seeker, meaning the STCA may have reduced Canadian spending on asylum seekers by $2 billion over a 10-year period, he wrote.
(Those are first-year, or start-up costs only, he noted, and very quickly drop to near zero once refugees develop language skills and job placements.)
Since his report, however, Proctor said he has revised his thinking that there would be a huge influx of asylum seekers coming to Canada if the STCA was scrapped.
He said he now takes into account that — with the spread of information about safer places to cross the border illegally — it has become much easier to cross at these unofficial spots.
He expects a "moderate noticeable uptick" in the number of asylum claims if the STCA were scrapped.
"I would still say you expect to see more asylum claims coming from the U.S. if the Safe Third Country Agreement was disbanded or suspended. But originally, I thought you would expect to see a lot more," Proctor said.
The increase of asylum claims would put more pressure on resources and exacerbate the problems with backlogs, he said.
Anna Pape, a spokeswoman for the IRB, said in an email that changes to the global environment have led to a "steady and significant increase in refugee claim referrals over the last few years" and resulted in a "growing backlog."
- Canada ready to 'have a conversation' on changing Safe Third Country deal, but no formal talks underway
As of April 30, 2018, there were more than 55,000 pending cases, and the projected wait time for claims for refugee protection before the board has increased to approximately 20 months, Pape said.
However, she said the IRB has improved its efficiency and that the number of refugee claims finalized has increased by approximately 40 per cent over the past year. She said the IRB projects to be able to finalize up to 2,500 refugee claims per month.
With files from The Associated Press