Nova Scotia

Nova Scotia Power may spend hundreds of millions on 3 hydro systems

Nova Scotia Power is considering spending hundreds of millions of dollars to extend the life of three hydro systems, including its two largest and North America's first and only tidal power generating station on the Annapolis River

'It's a complex problem,' says Acadia University geoscientist

A Nova Scotia Power study says it would cost $194 million to decommission the dams and generating stations in the Black River hydro system, compared to $47 million to maintain them. (Paul Withers/CBC)

Nova Scotia Power is considering spending hundreds of millions of dollars to extend the life of three hydro systems, including its two largest and North America's first and only tidal power generating station on the Annapolis River.

The utility is in the midst of planning what the electrical system will need over the next two decades and beyond.

Part of that includes a 665-page study that compares the cost of keeping, or closing, all 17 hydro systems in Nova Scotia.

Hydro dams produce about eight per cent of the province's electricity.

Decommissioning could cost $1.53 billion

Maintaining the entire hydro system is forecast to cost a whopping $753 million over the next 40 years.

But it's half the cost of decommissioning, which the utility estimates at $1.5 billion.

Acadia University geoscientist Ian Spooner says it's expensive to remove a dam. (CBC)

The study was filed with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.

This is not an academic exercise for Nova Scotia Power customers. They will end up paying whether the utility decides to keep or close a hydro system.

Nova Scotia Power is already before regulators seeking approval to spend $18 million to maintain the Tusket River hydro system in southwestern Nova Scotia.

It argues decommissioning the system would be three times more expensive.

'Extremely expensive'

"I'm not surprised," said Ian Spooner, a geoscientist at Acadia University. "It's an extremely expensive job to remove a dam."

In addition to removing structures like spillways and powerhouses, decommissioning also requires managing sedimentation in lakes created behind a dam.

The hydro study says dealing with sedimentation can account for 48 per cent of infrastructure removal costs.

"It's a complex problem," Spooner said. "Do we spend the money to return things back to a natural state or do we keep the system in place? Maybe [there could be] energy benefits from that in an altered environment."

The Lumsden generating station is part of the Black River hydro system. (CBC)

Spooner said when a lake is drained it can expose accumulated sediment containing naturally occurring chemicals like mercury.

"And that can create environmental challenges," he said.

The hydro study blanks out estimates for "sedimentation management" and forecasts for the cost of conducting archeology. Spooner said many of the river systems flooded by hydro projects are significant to First Nations.

"You have to go in and take a look before you repurpose that land or do anything with it to see if there's sites of archeological significance."

Hydro systems under review

Over the next 18 months, Nova Scotia Power will consider its options for several hydro systems.

It wants to know if it's worth spending $19 million to extend the life of the controversial tidal generating station on the Annapolis River.

Its huge rotating blades kill fish. The extent and impact is being reviewed by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

Nova Scotia Power is looking at other numbers.

"A detailed analysis on the feasibility of a Life Extension and Modernization (LEM) projects is being undertaken to determine if it is economically justifiable," Nova Scotia Power said in the hydro study.

The tidal power station was built in 1984 as a research facility and is approaching the end of its life.

"Although the facility was only committed to run for four years, NS Power has successfully maintained it for a much longer period," Nova Scotia Power said. "As such, it requires a capital investment in excess of what the sustaining capital would dictate."

Nova Scotia Power predicts, with the life extension, maintaining the Annapolis tidal generating plant will cost $34 million compared to $23 million for decommissioning..

Wreck Cove life extension

The utility is also considering an $84-million life extension at the province's largest hydro system at Wreck Cove, Cape Breton.

The study says it would cost $424 million to decommission Wreck Cove compared to $160 million to sustain.

Mulling a $320 million Mersey system redevelopment

Nova Scotia's second largest hydro system is on the Mersey River system in Queens County.

Nova Scotia Power forecasts $355 million will be needed to maintain it. Most of that is $320 million in redevelopment costs.

The utility forecasts $213 milion to decommission.

Nova Scotia Power declined an interview saying the hydro study is part of its application for regulatory approval for capital spending in 2019.

Spokesperson David Rodenhiser said the study is just one factor as Nova Scotia Power considers its overall needs and where hydro fits in the grid.

"And we need to understand the cost of replacing the electricity that would be lost by decommissioning any generation system, which would almost certainly need to be renewable generation in order to meet our legislated requirements," Rodenhiser said in an email.

About the Author

Paul Withers

Reporter

Paul Withers is an award-winning journalist whose career started in the 1970s as a cartoonist. He has been covering Nova Scotia politics for more than 20 years.

Comments

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.