Yukon Party won’t cancel mineral claims in the Peel

Scott Kent, Minister of Energy, Mines and Resources, says cancelling claims would create a series of lawsuits and demands.

Reversing Peel claims 'would send shockwaves through the investment community:' Mines Minister

The Hart River Canyons in the Peel Watershed. Debate raged in Yukon's legislature yesterday over whether it would be possible to rescind mineral claims inside protected areas in the government's new land use plan. (Juri Peepre)

The Yukon government says it won't be cancelling mineral claims in protected areas of the Peel Watershed.

Scott Kent, Minister of Energy, Mines and Resources, says cancelling claims would create a series of lawsuits and demands.  

Scott Kent, Yukon's Minister of Energy, Mines and Resources, says expropriating mineral claims the Peel Watershed 'would send shockwaves through the investment community.' (Yukon Legislative Assembly)
“It’s something that we think would send shockwaves through the investment community if we were to expropriate or compensate.”

The debate took place yesterday in the legislature, as protesters gathered to protest the Peel Watershed land use plan.

Many were disappointed when the Yukon government released its land use plan for the area that feeds the Peel River in January. The government’s plan protects 29 per cent of the region from development, rather than the 80 per cent called for by the Peel River planning commission.

It also says existing mineral claims in protected areas are still valid and can be developed, such as those held by Tarsis Resources in the southeast part of the region

Yesterday, the opposition said the Yukon government could cancel or expropriate existing claims in the Peel without paying companies.

“The government knows full well they have no obligation to pay compensation,” says Jim Tredger, Yukon NDP MLA for Mayo Tatchun.

Kent disagreed. 

“From the year 2000 to 2008 there was almost $50 million spent in the Peel Watershed,” he said in the House. “Those are real dollars spent by public companies, many of their shareholders are Yukoners. Of course they would be looking for compensation.”

The Yukon Government's plan for the Peel watershed will open up 71 per cent of the area to industrial development.
The opposition also asked the government to stop any new staking until a court case on the land use plan is resolved.

Two Yukon First Nations and two conservation groups launched a lawsuit in late January.

The government says it welcomes prospectors who want to stake their claim in the Peel region.

In spite of the opposition, and the protesters outside, Yukon Environment Minister Currie Dixon defended the government's environmental record.

He says Yukon is setting an example for the rest of Canada.

“I don’t agree with the characterization that the leader of the NDP has suggested here when she suggests that our actions are token gestures,” he said. “When we look across the board at some of the actions we have taken, Yukon now protects more of our land base than any other province and territory in the country.”


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.