Four oil and gas companies could get exclusive lifetime exploration rights in N.W.T.
'A significant portion of the Central Mackenzie Valley is, for all intents and purposes, closed'

Four oil and gas companies are now poised to get the exclusive lifetime rights to explore a large swath of land — nearly 4,000 square kilometres — in the once-promising Canol shale south of Norman Wells.
Earlier this month, an expert panel tapped by the territory's oil and gas regulator, OROGO, confirmed that a well drilled and hydraulically fractured by ConocoPhillips in 2014 led to a "significant discovery" of hydrocarbons.
The decision paves the way for ConocoPhillips to acquire a significant discovery licence from Wally Schumann, the minister of Industry, Tourism and Investment. That kind of licence comes with no expiry date, meaning ConocoPhillips would have the exclusive rights to explore its parcel of land forever.
But, partly because shale oil deposits are known to extend over vast amounts of land, the expert panel decided that other companies with exploration licences covering parcels close to Conoco's — Husky Energy, Shell and MGM Energy — can now also immediately apply to Schumann for significant discovery licences.
A hasty decision?
Doug Matthews, an energy analyst and the former director of the N.W.T.'s oil and gas division, says the panel's all-in-one decision is hasty.
He says it puts the fate of the Canol shale oil play in the hands of only a few companies at an early stage of the shale's development.
"A significant portion of the Central Mackenzie Valley is, for all intents and purposes, closed," says Matthews.
James Fulford, the executive director of the independent Office of the Regulator of Oil and Gas Operations (OROGO), says the expert panel calculated the size of the significant discovery area based on evidence provided by all the companies, including drilling results and seismic data.
But Matthews says he's worried that once the companies acquire these exclusive licenses, the land will sit idle.
In March 2015, ConocoPhillips said it was not planning further work on its parcel for the foreseeable future.
"Although a significant discovery declaration and subsequent significant discovery licence is a positive indication for a play, it does not indicate commercial viability," said a spokesperson for ConocoPhillips at the time.
Corrections
- A previous version of this story said that all companies normally need to apply for their own significant discovery declarations. In fact, that is not always the case.Sep 22, 2016 11:21 AM CT
Comments
To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.
By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.
Become a CBC Account Holder
Join the conversation Create account
Already have an account?