HMS Terror find under review by federal government, Nunavut government
'There may be an agenda in play focused on discrediting ARF,' claims lawyer for Arctic Research Foundation
The events leading up to the discovery of Sir John Franklin's second ship in Nunavut waters are being investigated by the territorial and federal governments to determine if the search was conducted legally.
The Arctic Research Foundation discovered HMS Terror, the second, long-lost ship in the doomed Franklin expedition in the 1840s, at the bottom of Terror Bay by in early September.
But Nunavut's government says the foundation — a private non-profit created by Jim Balsillie, former chairman of BlackBerry-maker Research in Motion — didn't have the permits to look for the ship.
A violation of Nunavut's archeological regulations can carry a summary conviction with either a fine or imprisonment.
"The Department of Justice is working with the Public Prosecution Service of Canada to review the events leading up to the discovery of HMS Terror," reads an email from Nunavut's Justice Department.
"Until that review process is complete, we cannot comment further."
Acting on a tip from Sammy Kogvik from Gjoa Haven, Nunavut, the foundation sailed to Terror Bay on board its research vessel Martin Bergmann. At the same time, Parks Canada staff were searching Victoria Strait.
"The Arctic Research Foundation did not have a permit from the Government of Nunavut to conduct a search in Terror Bay, or in any other location," wrote Doug Stenton, Nunavut's director of heritage, in an email.
"It is my understanding that the Arctic Research Foundation's involvement in the Franklin project since 2012 falls under an agreement between the Foundation and Parks Canada.
"As such, field activities conducted by the Arctic Research Foundation are assigned by Parks Canada in consultation with the Foundation, and are governed by the permit issued to Parks Canada," said Stenton.
Parks Canada has not yet responded to interview requests.
A letter dated Oct. 4 from Linda Pieterson with the law firm Ricketts Harris LLP to Stenton shows a rift between the foundation and Parks Canada.
"ARF acknowledges that its relationship with Parks Canada is strained and not functioning like it did in prior years," writes Pieterson.
"If a change was made to the Parks Canada Permits that narrowed their ambit in 2016, such a change was done without ARF's knowledge.
"If ARF in any way acted offside the regulations, it did so innocently and without harm."
The letter in part explained why there was an eight-day delay in informing the federal government about the finding.
Unlike HMS Erebus, the letter indicates there was no notification protocol in place. The letter says the foundation attempted to finalize a communication strategy with Parks Canada in the spring of 2016 but received no response.
According to the letter, on the day of the discovery, the Martin Bergmann was conducting scientific research in the Queen Maud Gulf when Kogvik shared his story about coming across the mast of what he thought was a ship years earlier.
As the crew of the Bergmann threw a community feast in Gjoa Haven to celebrate the finding of the ship, staff from Parks Canada had to reorganize and wait for bad weather to pass before they could head out from Victoria Strait to Terror Bay.
"Unfortunately, rather than this being treated as fantastic news for all partners, celebrated and shared by all, the discovery of HMS Terror has been tainted by negative, and unfounded, statements made in respect of ARF," writes Pieterson.
'Outside of the spirit of partnership and cooperation'
Lawyers for the foundation say the organization will co-operate with any investigation. But Pieterson's letter indicates they're not particularly happy about it.
"Recent statements made to the media have forced ARF to struggle with whether certain motivations have been generated outside of the spirit of partnership and cooperation. These statements began immediately after ARF volunteered to provide all of its information to the Government of Nunavut — before government officials had even inspected the ship," writes Pieterson.
"Regrettably, ARF has been left to conclude that there may be an agenda in play focused on discrediting ARF, its people and its work."