Nfld. & Labrador

Lower Churchill project gets environmental green light

The Muskrat Falls hydro project has passed an environmental review, clearing another hurdle to the Labrador power generation facility becoming a reality.

Ottawa, N.L. conclude that benefits of Muskrat Falls hydro outweigh potential risks

Muskrat Falls is seen at the Churchill River in central Labrador in this undated file photograph. It is the site of the proposed Lower Churchill Hydro Project. (Greg Locke/Reuters)

The Lower Churchill hydro project has passed the environmental review process, clearing another hurdle to the Labrador power generation plant becoming a reality.

In its response to the review panel’s report, Ottawa says the benefits of the project outweigh potential risks.

"The government of Canada has determined that the expected significant energy, economic, socio-economic and environmental benefits outweigh the ‘significant adverse environmental effects’ of the project that have been identified in the panel report," federal officials stated.

Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Peter Penashue — the province’s rep in the Harper cabinet — lauded the outcome.

"This decision is an important step toward realizing the full potential of one of North America’s most ambitious renewable energy projects," Penashue said in a statement.

"It will deliver countless economic benefits to our already flourishing province, to Nova Scotia, and to the rest of Canada."

The province released the project from further environmental review, with a number of conditions.

"Today’s release from the environmental assessment process represents another important milestone and a major step forward as we move towards our decision on final project sanction of Muskrat Falls," Natural Resources Minister Jerome Kennedy said in a news release.

Both levels of government will now move forward with issuing the permits necessary for the project to proceed.

'Inadequate' analysis

Last summer, the joint federal-provincial environmental review panel called Nalcor Energy's analysis of the project "inadequate," while also asking for more information from the Crown-owned company.

The review panel recommended a new, independent analysis based on economic, energy and environmental considerations.

That new analysis recommended by the panel would take into consideration domestic energy demand projections, as well as alternate energy sources, such as using offshore gas as a fuel for the Holyrood thermal generating facility.

But the two levels of government rejected that panel recommendation.

The federal government said it carried out its own economic analysis of the project — one that backed the Lower Churchill option.

That analysis, "while identifying risks and uncertainties, concluded by supporting Nalcor’s assertions that the project represents the least cost option for meeting anticipated provincial electricity demand."

That finding, Ottawa stresses, was corroborated by an independent report recently submitted to the province’s Public Utilities Board by Manitoba Hydro.