'Dead men tell no tales': Former justice left with questions in Don Dunphy shooting
Former justice asked to write report about RCMP investigation, says 'a lot of it is troublesome'
A retired judge who oversaw the police investigation into Don Dunphy's death says he is still left with many questions about the fatal shooting.
David Riche, a retired Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court Justice, was hired to provide oversight to the RCMP investigation.
But he says his role was limited, and he questions why the confrontation between Dunphy and Royal Newfoundland Constabulary Const. Joe Smyth ever happened.
"I find it hard to understand how this happened," he told CBC News. "Then I say to myself, 'Well maybe it shouldn't have happened at all.'"
Dunphy, 59, was shot and killed at his home in Mitchell's Brook by Smyth on April 5, 2015. At the time, Smyth was assigned to then-premier Paul Davis' security detail.
Riche said he was hired that same week as an "independent observer" of the RCMP investigation into the incident.
But according to Riche, he wasn't allowed to question many witnesses — or speak to Smyth. He said he found the RCMP did not always accept his suggestions, and felt investigators "leaned towards accepting Smyth's account."
"They basically accepted [Smyth's] statement, and that was basically the end of the matter," Riche said.
"Well, dead men tell no tales and … police didn't want me to do any investigation."
'Intention to kill'
Riche said Smyth shot four bullets at Dunphy. The last, he said, was fired in close proximity — within three or four feet — with one shot going "right straight through his head."
"It showed to me that there was an intention to kill, it wasn't an intention to stop."
Police initially said Dunphy was shot after pointing a firearm at Smyth. But Riche explained he felt there was an "issue" surrounding where Dunphy got a gun as some family members said the man didn't have one in his home.
Riche said he wasn't convinced the gun's placement on the floor during a crime scene re-creation was consistent with someone who was shot in that manner.
While Smyth said he fired after being threatened, Riche believes Dunphy's gun was not ready to fire at the time.
I find it hard to understand how this happened.- David Riche
"There's a side lever on these guns. You pull them back and that's where you put the shell in, and then you close it. I think that in this particular case, it was probably open," said Riche.
"I'm not sure if it was loaded or not, but I don't think it could have been fired as it was, unless you did something [to it]."
'Two angry men'
Riche characterized the incident as a confrontation between "two angry men."
While Dunphy was considered to be outspoken, Riche said there was an incident in the past where Smyth "got into difficulties."
"He wasn't, what you might call, the type of person who'd be a quiet person, who would be afraid of dealing with an issue," he said. "He could be aggressive, that was my impression."
Riche said both men had tempers.
Smyth did not respond to questions from CBC News, but in a statement last week said the pending public inquiry is stopping him from answering all "necessary and valid questions."
'A lot of contradictions'
Riche said he pored over the investigation for more than eight months, and wrote a 23-page report that he handed over to the RCMP.
And while he said he can't disclose exactly what it contains, he does have comments and criticisms for police.
"There's a lot of contradictions. Like in the front of Dunphy's house, there were signs, 'No government people, nobody allowed in,' and that kind of stuff. And yet Smyth says he came to to the door, and was … invited in.
"When I talked to … Dunphy's daughter, she was of the view that he said he wouldn't have allowed him in, and would have tried to get rid of him."
Riche said he was also bothered by the fact that Smyth decided to go to Dunphy's home alone.
"Because the RCMP guy in Holyrood, right alongside where he was going down [to Mitchell's Brook], had offered to go with him."
Pushing for an inquiry
Despite his criticisms, Riche said he believes the overall investigation was handled fairly by the RCMP.
"I thought they did a very thorough investigation, and what conclusions they came to are their conclusions."
Riche said it may never be known exactly what happened inside Dunphy's home, but hopes his report will be released and there will be an inquiry into the matter — one where people can be further questioned about the incident.
"[Then] you'll get a better handle on what likely happened."
In a statement sent Tuesday, the province's Department of Justice said significant progress is being made towards starting the inquiry process.
With files from Carolyn Stokes