New Brunswick

Hearing underway to decide if Restigouche Hospital Centre class action can proceed

A hearing began this week to determine if a proposed class action lawsuit on behalf of patients at the Restigouche Hospital Centre alleging decades of negligence can proceed to trial.

Lawsuit alleges decades of mistreatment of patients at New Brunswick's only psychiatric hospital

The Restigouche Hospital Centre is New Brunswick's psychiatric hospital. (Shane Fowler/CBC)

A hearing began this week to determine if a proposed class action lawsuit on behalf of patients at the Restigouche Hospital Centre alleging decades of negligence can proceed to trial.

Court of Queen's Bench Justice Tracey DeWare is presiding over the certification hearing in Moncton that began Tuesday and continued throughout Wednesday.

A statement of claim naming the New Brunswick government and Vitalité Health Network as defendants was filed in May 2019 on behalf of all patients who have resided or been treated at the facility in Campbellton since 1954. It seeks $500 million in damages.

The claim alleges the province and health authority were negligent in operation of the psychiatric facility. It also alleges breaches of section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. That section protects people with a mental disability, among other groups, from discrimination.

The claims have not been tested in court.

Darrell Tidd and Reid Smith are the representative plaintiffs in the proposed class action. They are fathers and litigation guardians for their sons, Devan Tidd and Aaron Smith, who are patients at the hospital.

The province and Vitalité argued Wednesday the case shouldn't be certified, citing various reasons.

Denis Thériault, a lawyer representing the provincial government, told DeWare that a class action isn't the proper mechanism for the allegations. 

"We reject that this is the proper process," Thériault said Wednesday, saying there aren't enough common issues with all patients of the facility for a class action. 

He said individual patients alleging problematic treatment should instead file medical malpractice cases. Vitalité lawyer Talia Profit echoed that point later in the day. 

Lawyer Talia Profit, representing Vitalité Health Network, leaves the Moncton courthouse Wednesday after two days of legal arguments about whether a class action lawsuit should be certified. (Shane Magee/CBC)

"Individual actions would be more practical, more efficient," she said. She said that way the cases could name defendants who are more relevant to their claim, such as specific physicians.

Thériault also said the province isn't responsible for the policies and day-to-day operations of Restigouche. He acknowledged there have been issues at the facility. 

"It's not without its challenges, no one is going to deny that, at least from our end as the province," Thériault said. 

The case was filed after Ombud Charles Murray issued a report that found "significant mistreatment" of patients at the facility and safety risks to patients and staff. It found chronic under-staffing at the hospital. 

Whether that report can be used as part of the case is in dispute as part of the certification hearing. 

Profit argued that the damages totalling hundreds of millions would harm Vitalité's efforts to improve care at Restigouche.

"The kind of damages they're looking for would cripple those efforts," she said.

A large financial payout would also harm Vitalité's ability to pay for the other health–care facilities it manages, she said.

The hearing is scheduled to resume Thursday. It's unclear how soon DeWare will issue a decision on whether to certify the class action.


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Become a CBC Member

Join the conversationCreate account

Already have an account?