New Brunswick

Inquiry into Andrew Harvey controversy appears unlikely

The provincial government appears to be closing the door to an inquiry into the Andrew Harvey case — despite Brian Gallant’s call for one just three days before September’s election.

Brian Gallant called for a public inquiry into the handling of charges against Liberal Andrew Harvey

It was revealed in the election campaign Andrew Harvey and two relatives had been charged with two counts of fraud in July. The charges were later dropped. (CBC)

The provincial government appears to be closing the door to an inquiry into the Andrew Harvey case — despite Brian Gallant’s call for one just three days before September’s election.

Attorney General Serge Rousselle brushed off Opposition calls for such an inquiry during Question Period on Thursday, suggesting that calling one would violate the independence of the Public Prosecutions Office.

Progressive Conservative MLA Ross Wetmore quoted the calls for an inquiry into the Harvey controversy on Thursday that Brian Gallant made during the election campaign. (CBC)
“The public prosecution office operates independently,” Rousselle said.

“Independently from what? Independently from the political arm of government.”

He said prosecutorial independence was vital to everyone being treated equally before the law “and I intend to uphold that principle.”

Harvey was charged with fraud in the weeks leading up to the campaign, only to see the charges dropped 10 days before the election. He ended up winning the Carleton-Victoria riding for the Liberals.

Rousselle was responding Thursday to Progressive Conservative MLA Ross Wetmore, who quoted the calls for an inquiry that Gallant made during the campaign, before he was premier.

Attorney General Serge Rousselle brushed off calls for an inquiry into the Harvey case on Thursday. (CBC)
Rousselle responded by quoting then-Tory attorney general Ted Flemming, who said during the campaign that while the head of public prosecutions could review the case, “it is not for government to do.”

“I completely agree,” Rousselle said.

That contradicts Gallant’s comments of Sept. 19, when he said the Liberals would support an independent inquiry.

Rousselle’s decision likely means the public will never find out the truth behind the twisting tale of the Harvey case.

Charges became public during campaign

The Liberal candidate, along with his father and brother, were charged with fraud and forgery in Woodstock court on July 29. The charges alleged they had cut Crown wood and passed it off as coming from private land.

The charges were reported by the media on Sept. 3, after several reporters were tipped off about them. The tip to CBC News came from an anonymous e-mail account.

Gallant, in the midst of the election campaign, suspended Harvey as a Liberal candidate the same day.

Then, on Sept. 12, the charges against the Harveys were suddenly dropped.

Gallant reinstated Harvey as part of the Liberal slate and -- while he was careful to not explicitly allege political interference in the case by the Progressive Conservative government then in power — told reporters “one of the main things we need to have answered” is “the timing of everything that has transpired.”

The controversy prompted Luc Labonte, the assistant deputy minister in the attorney general’s office who oversees prosecutions, to issue a rare public statement on Sept. 15.

Labonte didn’t discuss the laying of the charges, but said “a secondary review” had found that they “didn’t meet the threshold required to prosecute.”

He said there would be a review of the process that led to the charges, but despite that commitment, Gallant continued to call for an independent inquiry.

On Sept. 19, just three days before the election, Gallant said he hoped “that we would have an inquiry done now, that the premier would call one. … We certainly would support an independent inquiry into this matter.”

He pointed to comments by the retired natural resources officer who laid the charges, Allen Goodine.

Goodine told CBC News that he had received a “strange” phone call from a senior departmental official looking for details of the charges just four days before journalists were tipped off.

Gallant even suggested on Sept. 19 that he’d support the inquiry becoming public.

While he said he didn’t want to put any constraints on whoever might handle such an inquiry, “I certainly would look at making it public if we form government and if we can finally have someone independently look at this.”

About the Author

Jacques Poitras

Provincial Affairs reporter

Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. Raised in Moncton, he also produces the CBC political podcast Spin Reduxit.


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.