Supreme Court will hear Radio-Canada appeal on revealing anonymous sources

The Supreme Court of Canada says it will hear an appeal filed by Radio-Canada, after one of its investigative reporters was compelled by a Quebec court decision to reveal her anonymous sources.

In March, Marie-Maude Denis was asked to testify and divulge her sources by Quebec Superior Court

Defence lawyers have alleged that media reports — such as those by Marie-Maude Denis — mean that it's impossible for their clients to get a fair trial. (Sarah Leavitt/CBC)

The Supreme Court of Canada announced today it will hear an appeal filed by Radio-Canada, after one of its investigative reporters was compelled to reveal her anonymous sources in a Quebec Superior Court decision last March.

Radio-Canada investigative journalist Marie-Maude Denis is appealing a decision that would have forced her to reveal her sources.

The case comes alongside allegations of fraud, conspiracy and breach of trust against former Liberal cabinet minister Marc-Yvan Côté, which came about after a report by Denis.

That report was a precursor to Côté's arrest by UPAC, Quebec's anti-corruption unit. He now faces several corruption-related charges.

Lawyers for the defence have alleged that information leaks from at least one state employee led to media reports — such as the one by Denis — that made it impossible for their client to get a fair trial.

In a stay of proceedings motion filed by Côté's lawyers, they argued that "the timing of these leaks and their number indicates that they are not the fault of a lone wolf, but of a group of representatives of the order trying to establish a parallel judicial system in Quebec, with access to confidential documents likely to cause significant political damage." 

In March, Denis was asked to testify and divulge her sources — something she claims would violate her journalistic integrity.

Until the case is decided, Côté's trial alongside his five co-accused, including the former Liberal MNA Nathalie Normandeau, is suspended by order of the Superior Court of Quebec.

The Supreme Court decision will be a test for the federal Journalistic Sources Protection Act, which has been in effect since last fall when it passed unanimously in the House of Commons.

The act stipulates that a journalist may refuse to disclose information in court if it is likely to identify a journalistic source, unless certain very specific conditions are met.

With files from Radio-Canada


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Become a CBC Member

Join the conversation  Create account

Already have an account?