Province not ready to send workers north to help with Churchill train woes
Rail line to remote, northern Manitoba community seriously damaged during spring flood
The Manitoba government isn't ready to send any provincial employees north to help restore the flood-damaged rail line to Churchill.
"Right now we have no immediate action to take," Mike Gagne, director of operations for Manitoba's Emergency Measures Organization (EMO), told reporters Monday in Winnipeg.
"Unless you gather information, do a fulsome assessment, it's really difficult to know what immediate action you could take, because these are complex issues and looking at the amount of goods and materials and services that you need to sustain, there isn't something that you can figure out over a weekend."
The northern town, located about 1,000 kilometres north of Winnipeg, has been without rail service for weeks after a pair of blizzards and a massive spring melt washed out a section of the line in May.
Denver-based Omnitrax, which owns and operates the rail line, told the province at a meeting on Friday that damage to the rail line is so severe it could take until the winter or spring to fix completely.
"They think the rail service will be disrupted indefinitely," Gagne said.
EMO has assembled a group of officials who continue to meet with town representatives, Gagne said.
So far, the town has been dealing directly through private businesses to transport goods and passengers out of Churchill. Thompson-based northern airline Calm Air has been helping to fly supplies into Churchill lately, but local businesses are hurting from the rail service stoppage.
- Churchill residents face rising cost of food after rail line suspended
- Province to lower food prices in remote, northern Manitoba
- Suspension of Churchill's only rail line forcing business owners to lay off workers
"The additional flights from Calm Air, direct from Thompson to Churchill, that were arranged between them and the town ... will help out, I'm sure," Gagne said.
"But we do not know the extent to which this is actually going to help the larger issues at play."
'Keep the cupboards stocked'
Concerns over rising food costs are mounting as tourism season gets underway in Churchill this month.
"We can surmise and guess, and there's been a lot of anecdote about how much it's going to cost, how much more for freight, but we don't know until we look at the hard numbers and the alternative arrangements," Gagne said.
"But that's definitely one of our concerns, the provisions of food to Churchill, so they can keep the cupboards stocked."
Going forward, fuel and construction materials will likely have to be shipped in by tanker, Gagne said.
Churchill officials were expected to hold an emergency meeting open to the public on Monday night. Gagne said no one from EMO would be present for the meeting.
"They're a resilient group up there as we can imagine, and we're just going to have to find out from the mayor and his folks where things sit with them."
Road or rail?
Barry Prentice, a transportation economist at the University of Manitoba, said in the short term perishable foods will have to continue to be flown in.
"It really comes down to the longer term," Prentice said.
"We know the section of track that is the problem — it's the section of track that runs from Gillam up to Churchill — and that was never the optimal route in the first place," Prentice said, adding the route was built over areas where there is permafrost that makes for unstable ground during spring thawing. "It's been a problem ever since."
He says Manitoba and Churchill have to decide whether to reroute the current rail line or build a road to avoid weather-related rail disruptions in the future.
"Is this fix going to be the fix, or is it just going to be another in a series of endless fixes for a route that was never actually likely to be a sustainable route?" Prentice said, adding climate change is only going to make things worse in the coming years.
"I think it's time to step back from this immediate problem and ask the ... serious question: do we really need a rail line to Churchill ... and if so, should we not maybe look at a different route to get there and solve the problem once and for all?"
With files from Chris Read and Susan Magas