London councillor questions $150,000 ask for outdoor fan area during Junos
Ward 11 coun. Stephen Turner says money should come from Tourism London's share of the hotel tax
It's been generating revenue for less than three months, but already London's Municipal Accommodation Tax (MAT) is spurring arguments over how the money should be spent.
Coun. Stephen Turner is questioning a request from the city's Juno bid committee for $150,000 to pay for a temporary outdoor fan area at Budweiser Gardens during the Junos, saying the money should instead come from Tourism London's share of the MAT.
To back his argument, the Ward 11 councillor points to a staff report presented earlier this year, when the city agreed to contribute $500,000 toward the city's Juno bid. Turner believes council was promised the city's contribution would be capped there.
"The expectations were laid out pretty clearly to us in the beginning," said Turner. "That they wouldn't be seeking any further funds and that when the accommodation tax was proposed to us, [their fund] would be the source of financing for any future bid asks."
London's four per cent accommodation tax came into effect in October, with its revenue split 50-50 between Tourism London and the city.
The tax on hotel stays generated $322,000 in its first month and staff estimate it's on pace to earn about $3 million a year.
A staff report on the MAT in June laid out how the city and Tourism London would share MAT money this way:
- Tourism London's share was to fund "expansion opportunities for three business units: sports, conventions and leisure travel." Their share was also earmarked to cover bids and anything that might increase visits to the city and enhance its profile.
- The city's share was slotted for "new and improved tourism infrastructure." This includes projects such as upgrading sporting facilities, building new wayfinding and helping the private sector with projects that enhance tourism infrastructure development. The report also said "the use of these revenues is unrestricted."
But Turner says the city's portion was to go toward tourism infrastructure that delivers long-lasting benefits to the city, while Tourism London's portion was for event bids and other expenses. Turner says a temporary outdoor shelter to create a "one-week parking lot party" is "more suited to their fund, our fund is for infrastructure."
Tourism London general manager John Winston disagrees.
"In this situation, it is a piece of infrastructure, albeit a temporary piece of infrastructure," he said. "I think personally it would qualify under this fund because it is a special event. The specific function of our fund is for promotion and product development."
Winston said the city paid for similar fencing during the Memorial Cup 2005 and tenting during the World Figure Skating Championships in 2013.
Winston also said the promise to cap the city's expenditure at $500,000 was restricted to the bid fee, not expenses for the event itself.
The funding request for the fan area will come up at Tuesday afternoon's meeting of the city's Corporate Services Committee.
Coun. Turner doesn't sit on that committee and can't attend, but says he's expecting other councillors will ask some of the same questions he has.
"I'm sure my colleagues on corporate services committee will give this a thorough vetting," he said. "There may be some explanations that are perfectly viable. I haven't heard those yet. I look forward to hearing the answers and having that conversation before council next week."
This report indicated that Tourism would receive 50% of the Hotel tax to support bids and promotional activities and council should use its 50% for a Tourism Development Infrastructure Fund for capital projects. A red carpet area isn't a capital project. <a href="https://t.co/tHCofSLscT">https://t.co/tHCofSLscT</a> <a href="https://t.co/d2gMTVdT9V">pic.twitter.com/d2gMTVdT9V</a>—@st3v3turn3r