Sexual abuse survivor hopes to take Catholic Diocese to court — again
Irene Deschenes reported being sexually abused by Father Charles Sylvestre as a child between 1970 and 1973
For the second time, a local woman is hoping to take the London Catholic Diocese to court to seek compensation for the "harm she suffered throughout her life" after being sexually abused by a Catholic priest.
Irene Deschenes reported being sexually abused by Father Charles Sylvestre as a child between 1970 and 1973. In 2000, she settled a civil suit against the diocese whose officials claimed no knowledge of any abuse by Sylvestre during that time period.
On Thursday, Deschenes sought to set aside her settlement with the diocese to make way for a second civil suit that suggests officials knew about Sylvestre's behaviour way before her original settlement.
"We're asking the court to reopen the settlement on the basis of evidence that came out after [Deschenes] settled the case that the diocese knew that [Sylvestre] had been molesting children back in the 1960s and before," said Toronto lawyer Loretta Merritt.
"She didn't know that they were aware that he had molested children before he molested her so when she settled she did so without that information," said Merritt.
Defence lawyer Adam Stephens would not provide an interview. However, court documents filed by his firm suggest that a case that has come to its final and binding result can't be reopened
In 2006, six years after Deschenes' settlement, police reports filed in 1962 by victims of assault by Sylvestre surfaced, said Merritt.
Court documents suggest authorities provided copies of the police statements to the diocese.
The diocese claim "the police reports were discovered … in a location that nobody suspected contained relevant documents relating to Sylvester."
The defence is seeking to enforce the settlement and asked for "the dismissal of the plaintiffs' action on the basis that it is barred by a full and final release executed by the plaintiff in 2000 as part of a settle of the first action."
Court documents suggest that the settlement shouldn't be reopened because "there is a very strong public policy interested in the promotion of the finality of litigation and by extension, enforcing settlements" and "the language of the full and final release is clearly applicable to bar the within action." Other reasons have also been stated.
Waiting on decision
Both lawyers presented their arguments Thursday.
Over the next six months, the judge will consider whether to set aside the previous settlement.
If that happens, Deschenes will seek compensation for the "harm that she suffered throughout the course of her life, cost of past and future therapy, cost of past and future income losses as well as the pain and suffering that she's endured throughout her life as a result of what happened to her as a kid."
Many other women have come forward to allege sexual abuse — many of those cases were settled throughout the years. In 2006, Sylvestre was convicted of 47 counts of indecent assault and was sentenced to three years in prison. He died in 2007.