Here are 24 questions the city wants answered about the Red Hill Valley Parkway

Who saw a report showing substandard pavement friction on the Red Hill Valley Parkway? Why didn't they tell Hamilton city council? And did the failure to do so put drivers at risk?

The city has budgeted $7M for a judicial investigation - so far

The city has set aside $7 million for a judicial investigation into the Red Hill Valley Parkway. (Samantha Craggs/CBC)

Who saw a report showing substandard pavement friction on the Red Hill Valley Parkway (RHVP)? Why didn't they tell Hamilton city council? And did the failure to do so put drivers at risk?

Those are among the 24 questions the city wants a judge to tackle in a judicial investigation into the RHVP.

City council's general issues committed approved the list on Wednesday. They also agreed to set aside $7 million — to start — to pay for the investigation.

The city hopes to hire a judge in the next two months to conduct a public inquiry into a 2013 report by Tradewind Scientific. That report showed the slipperiness of the highway's pavement was below UK safety standards in some areas. Council only learned of the report's existence in February.

For years, councillors have been making decisions around millions in upgrades to the highway without having seen the report. Its reveal prompted council to repave the highway ahead of schedule, and reduce the speed limit from 90 km/h to 80.

A judicial investigation is independent, so a judge decides what to examine. Here are some other questions councillors want answered:

  • Who at the city saw the report after January 2014?
  • Based on city bylaws, policies and procedures, should councillors have been made aware of it? Why didn't they see it in 2014?
  • Who discovered it in 2018?
  • Did staff act appropriately after it was discovered in fall 2018? Should they have told council right away?
  • Did the delay put the public at risk?
  • Would anything in the report have triggered safety changes or further studies?

See the rest of the questions here

The judicial investigation could be a long, expensive affair. A city-hired outside lawyer told council to order an auditor general investigation instead, but council wanted a judicial investigation because it was more transparent.

The external lawyer said the investigation would cost between $1 million and $11 million.

The judge will set up an office and hire staff. The city will have lawyers too. On Wednesday, councillors approved hiring the law firm Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP.


Samantha Craggs is journalist based in Windsor, Ont. She is executive producer of CBC Windsor and previously worked as a reporter and producer in Hamilton, specializing in politics and city hall. Follow her on Twitter at @SamCraggsCBC, or email her at samantha.craggs@cbc.ca


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Become a CBC Member

Join the conversation  Create account

Already have an account?