Proposed federal rules would allow coal mines to release more toxins in their effluent
Critics say federal government has bowed to provincial, industry lobbying
The federal government has bowed to provincial and industry lobbying in weakening proposed standards for coal mining effluent, critics say.
A discussion document for draft regulations, released earlier this year, would double the amount of toxins — such as selenium — the mines are allowed to release and wouldn't apply to any mine that starts producing before 2027. Nor do they require companies to monitor overall environmental effects.
"Environment Canada got pushback," said Bill Donahue, an environmental scientific consultant and former head of monitoring for the Alberta government. "It dramatically reduced the proposed standards in terms of their stringency."
Environment Canada began reviewing its rules for coal mine effluent in 2017 and released a previous set of proposals in 2020.
Weaker in several ways
The current proposals are weaker in several respects.
They allow effluent to contain up to 20 micrograms of selenium per litre in any one sample and a monthly average of 10 micrograms. That's twice as much as the previous proposal.
"Concerns were raised by industry and provinces over the achievability of previously proposed new mine limits," the document says.
Selenium is an element closely associated with coal. It accumulates in the environment and damages the ability of fish to reproduce.
Allowable limits for suspended solids, which damage fish habitat, would be increased by about a third — again in response to industry concerns.
Some monitoring would end
As well, some contaminants associated with coal mines such as sodium, antimony and chloride won't have to be monitored, said Donahue.
Environment Canada also proposes to exempt from the new rules any mine that starts producing within three years of them coming into effect. Since the rules aren't expected to be proclaimed until the end of 2023 at the earliest, that means they wouldn't apply to any mine that starts producing before 2027.
A federal official, who spoke on background, defended the proposed contaminant limits.
"It is a number that is meant to be met at the end of pipe (where) you've got 100 per cent concentrated effluent. In the receiver, you've got some level of dilution."
Provinces can boost standards in permits
The selenium limits are intended to be a consistent national standard and provinces may attach more stringent standards to individual mine permits, she said.
She added the three-year delay before the rules take effect is to prevent companies with mines already in the planning stages from having to start over to meet new standards.
Katie Morrison of the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society noted Alberta is currently considering whether to open its Rocky Mountains to open-pit coal mines. She feared the draft regulations could allow projects to go ahead without having to meet even the looser requirements they propose.
"On the chance that we are seeing new opening mines, I think they should be expecting to put in water treatment technology that meets these upcoming — preferably more stringent — limits."
She said effluent standards shouldn't be based on what's convenient for industry.
"That's a backward approach. Rather than setting limits that protect water quality, they're setting limits that industry says they can meet."
'Focuses entirely on end-of-pipe'
Donahue said the proposals don't address what's actually happening in an ecosystem downstream of a mine or consider that many of the contaminants under consideration build up over time.
"It focuses entirely on end-of-pipe as opposed to what are the cumulative effects downstream. They are basically saying, 'If you release effluent that is less than this amount, we will deem it as having no effect."'
Companies would have to analyze selenium in adult fish tissue. But that won't reveal what's happening to the overall population, said Donahue.
Environment Canada is accepting public comment on the proposals until the end of March. Another 60-day comment period is expected at the end of the year with a final version of the regulations scheduled for the end of 2023.
- A previous version of this story incorrectly referred to the discussion document as draft regulations. As well, that version stated that allowable limits for suspended solids would double. In fact, they would be increased by about a third.Feb 13, 2022 10:38 PM MT
To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.
By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.
Become a CBC Account Holder
Join the conversation Create account
Already have an account?