Michelle Rempel says $50 per tonne carbon price will hurt Canadians but won't change their behaviour
Conservative Calgary MP questions effectiveness of Liberal plan, motivation of oil companies' support for it
Conservative MP Michelle Rempel says a federally mandated price on carbon of $50 per tonne by 2022 is "materially going impact people's lives" but at the same time she doubts it will be enough to actually change their behaviour.
"My main issue with this is I don't think it's going to work," Rempel told The Calgary Eyeopener on Thursday morning.
"At that price, demand for carbon products is likely not to change and, because of that, we're likely not going to meet the new targets that the government has selected."
- Justin Trudeau gives provinces until 2018 to adopt carbon price plan
- What a carbon price means for consumers
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced this week that provinces must begin pricing carbon dioxide emissions in a manner of their choosing — through means such as a cap-and-trade system or a carbon tax — with an effective, minimum price of $10 a tonne in 2018, rising by $10 each year to $50 a tonne in 2022.
Rempel joined The Eyeopener after publicly questioning big oil companies' support for a broad carbon-pricing policy.
Major oil and gas producers like Cenovus, Suncor and Shell Canada, as well as pipeline companies like Enbridge and TransCanada have been publicly advocating for carbon pricing for years but, in a tweet this week, Rempel suggested they might be more motivated by self-interest than concern about climate change.
Yes, the rich CEOs of the big companies that can scoop up assets after a tax bankrupts juniors player are certainly calling for this. <a href="https://t.co/Zhqb5huifI">https://t.co/Zhqb5huifI</a>—@MichelleRempel
She clarified Thursday that she hasn't heard specifically from small and medium oil producers that a national carbon price would hurt their competitiveness but she hasn't exactly heard them offer a ringing endorsement of the idea, either.
"I do think that, from the modelling that I've seen, that this is going to disproportionately affect junior oil and gas companies," she said.
"If the larger CEOs want to show that this is a level playing field, that this is not going to materially impact different sized players in the energy sector in different ways, I would be happy to look at that."
Carbon price not a 'panacea'
Rempel said the federal government's plan is not a "panacea" for climate change and challenged oil and gas executives who believe in the policy to bring forward evidence to support it.
"If the talking point from these big companies is we want to effect change, we actually want to do our part to address the very serious concern of climate change, then show the Canadian public that this is going to work," she said.
"If this is not going to work, then why are we imposing a tax on people? This is materially going to impact people's lives, because we all use carbon products."
Focusing too much on carbon pricing could end up being counterproductive to mitigating climate change, Rempel added.
"I actually worry that it's going to stifle a more innovative approach, perhaps a more multi-faceted approach that would allow us to take action on this issue," she said.
"I'd hate to be sitting here 10 years from now, after we, as a country, have adopted this and this alone as the way that we address the issue of climate change and then see our greenhouse gas emissions actually go up."