Equalization referendum during municipal elections gets panned, except by Farkas

The Alberta government’s plan to hold a referendum on equalization during municipal elections in October next year is getting the thumbs down across the board, except for an outspoken Calgary councillor who likes it.

Alberta government's idea not getting lots of votes

A lot of people don't like the idea of holding an equalization referendum during municipal elections next year, but one Calgary councillor does. (CBC)

The Alberta government's plan to hold a referendum on equalization during municipal elections in October next year is getting the thumbs down across the board, except for an outspoken Calgary councillor who likes it.

Changes to equalization was one of many recommendations coming out of the province's so-called "fair deal" panel report, which dropped Wednesday, along with creating a provincial police force and an Alberta pension plan.

Canada's equalization program is a way for the federal government to transfer funds to provinces so that every Canadian, no matter where he or she lived, would receive comparable services at comparable rates of taxation. A Canadian living in a smaller province with a weaker economy would have access to the same public services as one living in a fiscally stronger province, without their tax rates having to go through the roof. 

Alberta Premier Jason Kenney supported the current program when it was last adjusted in 2009 by Stephen Harper's Conservative government, of which Kenney was a cabinet minister.

But piggybacking the equalization referendum onto local elections is not winning a lot of votes.

'Drown us out'

The president of the Alberta Urban Municipalities Association says it would be combining two entirely different things and both would lose.

"It would just drown us out. There is no other way to put it," said Barry Morishita, who is also the mayor of Brooks.

"It would just drown out the people running on local issues for local consideration. There would be no other discussion except what's on that referendum."

Morishita says merging issues from two levels of government could be distracting.

"There are serious issues that the premier speaks about and they deserve their own place, and so they should be held separately so Albertans can concentrate on those important questions," he said.

"Imagine a scenario where a candidate is using that issue to get elected municipally, although it's not even a municipal issue. That doesn't seem fair."

'Disrespectful to citizens'

The mayor of Calgary says it's more than unfair.

"I think it is disrespectful to citizens who want to vote in their local elections to have their local elections — the coverage of them as well as the voter turnout — influenced by non-local issues," Naheed Nenshi said.

"Local elections are the one time every four years that citizens get a chance to really focus on their city councillor and on their mayor and what they want for that."

Nenshi joked that Calgary could have its own plebiscite on whether it gets a fair deal within Alberta, adding Calgary gives $5 billion more to the province than it gets in provincial spending.

A Calgary councillor says aligning an equalization referendum with a municipal election would actually be combining three levels of government.

"I think it's a bad idea," Druh Farrell said.

"It dilutes the conversation that we need to have as a city. Calgarians want a council that focuses on city issues, like transit and roads and policing and housing and getting the economy back on track, not a provincial dispute with the federal government."

'Good idea'

Another councillor, however, says go for it.

Jeromy Farkas says voters don't make the same distinctions as politicians.

"I think that for a number of good reasons, including the cost savings, it's a good idea to be asking this question at the same time as a municipal election."

2 conversations going on

A political scientist, Lisa Young, says there are two problems with the idea.

Firstly, people who might vote municipally may not be the same voters attracted to a provincial or federal issue.

"There are going to be two conversations going on at the same time," Young said.

And it also would require downloading the voting responsibilities from the province to local communities.

"If this is a vote that the premier thinks is important, maybe it's important enough to get the provincial election office to run it."

Government says it saves money

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Municipal Affairs says aligning a provincial referendum with municipal elections is common practice in North America.

"It saves time and money, and leads to increased voter participation, which is a good thing. Holding a referendum at a separate time would cost tens of millions of extra dollars," Tim Gerwing said.

The next election for municipalities in Alberta is Oct. 18, 2021.

With files from Scott Dippel, Elise von Scheel and Mark Gollom


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Become a CBC Member

Join the conversation  Create account

Already have an account?