British Columbia

Vancouver renters facing 5th eviction notice in 6 years at same house

Two Vancouver renters received an eviction notice this week — just days after the Residential Tenancy Branch ruled in their favour and threw out their landlord's attempt to evict them for the exact same reason. For one of the renters this is the fifth eviction attempt she's faced in six years.

Landlord argues he wants to take the house off the rental market so his sons can live there

Renter Dave Brighton stands on his front steps. Brighton and his neighbour Antonia Allan have faced multiple eviction attempts, but their landlord has repeatedly failed after the Residential Tenancy Branch ruled against him. (Rafferty Baker/CBC)

There's a rare three-storey house crammed between bigger buildings on Melville Street near Vancouver's Coal Harbour. 

Assessed at more than $10 million, landlord Brent Wolverton collects a little more than $900 each month in rent from the hundred-year-old building.

This week, one of the last two tenants in the seven-room boarding-house style building found a fresh eviction notice on the door, just days after the Residential Tenancy Branch (RTB) ruled in her favour, saying a previous eviction order was not issued in good faith.

For Antonia Allan, who has lived in the house since 2003, this is the fifth eviction attempt she has faced in six years.

"Here we go again," said Allan on Wednesday. "This has gone on forever. The frustrating part is at this point I know I'll win through the tenancy branch, and at this point I also know he'll just give me another eviction."

Her neighbour Dave Brighton, 67, who has lived in the house almost as long as Allan, has survived nearly as many eviction attempts.

"I just want it to stop," said Brighton. "It's causing me no end of stress. I wake up in the morning — it's the first thing I think about and the last thing I think about before I go to bed at night. I keep wondering, are me and my cat going to be living on the street?"

Dave Brighton and his cat, Max, sit in his room. Brighton, who lives on a fixed income, fears he would have nowhere to go if his landlord successfully evicts him. (Rafferty Baker/CBC)

Multiple eviction attempts thrown out

Wolverton tried to evict the six tenants who were living in the house in 2013, saying he needed the property to house a property manager. That attempt was rejected by the RTB.

He tried to single out Allan with another eviction notice soon after in 2014, saying just her suite was needed to accommodate the caretaker. 

The house in question is surrounded by highrises and apartment buildings. The landlord, Brent Wolverton, owns several buildings in the neighbourhood. (Google)

The RTB once again ruled against Wolverton, the arbitrator writing, "the landlord has failed to establish a good faith intention. I determined the landlord has an ulterior motive to terminate the tenancy of what they perceive is a troublesome tenant."

In December 2018, an eviction attempt was rejected on a technicality, and it was quickly followed by another eviction notice against Brighton and Allan, who at this point were the only remaining tenants in the building.

This is the one that was decided last week in the tenant's favour.

Removing house from rental market

"I have the right if, I want to use it myself, to take the house off of the rental market," said Wolverton on Wednesday.

"I have two college kids. One of them graduated in December — and so he's home already — and the other one is coming home in May," he said.

Wolverton argued at the RTB hearing that his sons were planning to move in to the house. One of them, Jonathan Wolverton, even testified to that effect.

"I find that the testimony of both parties during the hearing raised questions about the landlord's good faith," wrote the RTB arbitrator in the case.

"I find that the landlord has not met their burden of proof to show that they do not have any other purpose in ending this tenancy," the decision continued.

'Eviction notice after eviction notice'

Vancouver West-End MLA Spencer Chandra Herbert is familiar with the case. 

"It's wrong. These people should feel safe in their homes — they're following the rules, and I think the man is acting in bad faith by just putting up eviction notice after eviction notice," said Chandra Herbert.

Wolverton said he had no recourse if he disagreed with an RTB decision, except to try again and hope for a different opinion. 

The building is a rare house on Melville Street near Vancouver's densely developed Coal Harbour. Its value was assessed at $10,380,900 last year, though the structures on the property accounted for little more than $50,000 of that. (Rafferty Baker/CBC)

"I'm not doing this to harass the tenants or any for any malicious reason. This is just simply the way the system works," he said. "This is the only path I have available."

Chandra Herbert disagreed, saying there is an appeal process available.

RTB investigation

Staff with the housing ministry sent CBC News a written statement.

"While the Residential Tenancy Act does not specify a limit to the number of times an eviction notice can be served, tenants have a right to be free of harassment and a right to peace, quiet and privacy in their homes," the statement said.

It went on to say the director of a new RTB compliance unit has been made aware of Brighton and Allan's case, and is investigating further.

Is there more to this story? Email

Follow Rafferty Baker on Twitter @raffertybaker

About the Author

Rafferty Baker is CBC Vancouver's mobile journalist. Follow him @raffertybaker


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.