B.C. privacy law applies to federal political parties, commissioner's office finds
Parties subject to law when it comes to collection, use of B.C. residents' personal information, decision says
The office of British Columbia's privacy commissioner has found that federal political parties are subject to the province's Personal Information Protection Act, a decision that experts say opens the door for a level of independent oversight not currently in place when it comes to understanding how the parties use personal data.
Colin Bennett, a professor in the department of political science at the University of Victoria who specializes in privacy and data protection, said the decision marks the first time an independent regulator has asserted jurisdiction over federal parties.
Canada is among a handful of democratic countries where privacy legislation doesn't cover political parties — except for in B.C., where the law and the commissioner's oversight extends to parties at the provincial level, Bennett said.
The decision from the office of B.C.'s privacy commissioner asserts that federal parties are also subject to the province's privacy law when it comes to the collection, use and disclosure of the personal information of B.C. residents.
"In my view, it's not something that the political parties should be in any way resisting,'' Bennett said of privacy legislation and oversight.
"It's just asking them to abide by the same set of rules that other organizations abide by, particularly when they're using vast quantities of personal data to engage in digital campaigning.''
Judicial review possible
The Liberal, Conservative and New Democratic parties have 30 days to apply for a judicial review of the March 1 decision by David Loukidelis, a lawyer and delegate of B.C.'s commissioner who previously served in the role.
Should the order stand, it means an investigation can proceed into the data handling practices of those three parties, as well as the federal Greens.
The decision stemmed from complaints by three B.C. residents who had asked the parties about the personal information they held about them, how it was used and to whom it had been disclosed. They were unsatisfied with the parties' responses.
The Liberal, Conservative and New Democratic parties sought to quash the complaints and challenged the constitutional authority of B.C.'s privacy commissioner to investigate under the province's privacy legislation.
Loukidelis, who is also a former B.C. deputy attorney general and justice minister, wrote in his decision that he was not persuaded by their arguments. He found the provincial commissioner has the jurisdiction to investigate the parties.
The Green Party did not challenge the complaints or investigation.
The Conservative and New Democratic parties did not respond to requests for comment on the decision from the office of B.C.'s privacy commissioner.
- B.C. government 'has chosen to ignore the rules' over freedom of information requests: privacy commissioner
Andrew Clement, a professor emeritus with the faculty of information at the University of Toronto, is one of the three B.C. residents who filed complaints. Any investigation into the parties' data practices could allay concerns, he said.
"Or it might reveal that they're handling our data in ways we didn't expect and which we, speaking as citizens, would find excessive or unwarranted or beyond things that we would consent to, or that we think is appropriate for a democratic government," he said.
Different rights in B.C.
If the investigation produces findings that compel the federal parties to change their data handling practices in order to comply with B.C.'s privacy laws, Bennett said it would mean B.C. residents would have different rights than other Canadians.
The parties would have to consider whether they want to apply one set of personal data protection and privacy rights in B.C. and another in the rest of Canada, and whether people in other provinces would stand for such a discrepancy, he said.
Any personal information shared online is at risk of being compromised or stolen. Learn more about protecting your digital identity from the most common <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CyberThreats?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#CyberThreats</a>: <a href="https://t.co/imx0WIO47b">https://t.co/imx0WIO47b</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/FPM2022?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#FPM2022</a> <a href="https://t.co/HaJHM8m7av">pic.twitter.com/HaJHM8m7av</a>—@cybercentre_ca
Quebec amended its legislation related to the protection of personal data last year to include certain provisions that cover political parties. Recent amendments to federal privacy legislation have not covered political parties, Clement noted.
Clement and the other complainants from B.C. are being supported by the Centre for Digital Rights, established by businessman and philanthropist Jim Balsillie.
The centre also supported Gary Dickson, a former member of the Alberta legislature who had served as Saskatchewan's privacy commissioner, in a complaint to the federal privacy commissioner over political parties' data practices.
The complaint argued that the parties were contravening the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act by not properly informing Canadians how they collect, use, or disclose their personal information to conduct political advertising, including "micro-targeted'' ads based on detailed profiles of individuals.
While privacy commissioner Daniel Therrien determined last May that the parties are not subject to the federal law since their activities are not commercial in nature, the statement announcing his decision notes that his office has repeatedly called for political parties to be subject to privacy legislation and independent oversight.