Business·Analysis

Why a Reddit group pumped GameStop shares up 1,000% on a lark

Shares in an obscure video game retailer have gained more than 1,000 per cent in recent weeks as an army of online investors are waging war against Wall Street behemoths they resent for their power, money and influence.

Online investor forums are waging war against short sellers trying to profit from falling prices

Wall Street short sellers have been caught in a short squeeze on GameStop shares in recent weeks as they have been forced to buy in at higher and higher prices to cover their bets. (Alex Kraus/Bloomberg News)

Shares in a U.S. retail chain that hasn't made any money in years have risen by 1,000 per cent in less than two weeks, wiping out billions of dollars from two Wall Street investment funds in the process.

The sentence above makes little sense at first blush, but it is nonetheless an apt description of the saga currently underway surrounding shares in GameStop.

GameStop is a retail chain with about 5,000 locations across North America which, as its name suggests, sells video games and game-related accessories.

Like many retailers, its business has been under pressure for several years now, because of a shift away from physical stores and toward online selling, which GameStop currently does very little of. Then the pandemic hit, exacerbated those problems and sent the stock down to multi-year lows.

In the early days of COVID-19, the company's shares were changing hands at around $4 US a share. They hit almost $400 on Wednesday for no good reason other than being caught in the middle of an epic battle between a couple of million online Davids who share stock tips on profanity-riddled message boards and the bespoke-suited stuffy Goliaths of Wall Street investment funds.

Wall Street has been betting against GameStop shares for well over a year now as investors known as short sellers have profited from the company's misery, driving the price down from around $25 in early 2017 to around $5 for most of last year.

Unlike long-term stock owners, short sellers make money on falling shares by borrowing the shares from existing shareholders, selling them and then buying them back to replace the shares they borrowed at a lower price later and pocketing the difference. 

WATCH: Here's an example of how short selling works using real numbers:

How short selling works

CBC News

2 years ago
0:46
An animated explanation of how people make money from stocks losing value 0:46

As long as the price goes down, short sellers make money. But when the stock goes up, short sellers have to buy into a rising market, which adds to the buying pressure, which pushes prices up even more in a vicious cycle for the short. That's known as a short squeeze, and what we're seeing right now may be the most dramatic one in history.

Enter WallStreetBets

The short sellers' best-laid plans for GameStop started to go off the rails a few months ago, when some members of a prominent Reddit community called WallStreetBets saw an opportunity to make some money and teach Wall Street a lesson in the process.

While many members of the subreddit of DIY investors genuinely think GameStop's core business of selling video games is a promising one, a small number of them saw an added reason to buy in because they caught wind of a growing short interest in the stock.

If enough buyers buy into a company and refuse to sell, the theory goes, that will drive the price of the shares higher. That, in turn, forces short sellers to fuel the price rise against their will by making them buy at ever-higher prices to cover their bets. The harder it is to find a stock to cover the short, the more expensive it will get, until momentum shifts.

The member credited with starting the movement, who goes by the handle Deep[Expletive]Value has posted screen grabs that suggest he has managed to turn an initial investment of about $50,000 into more than $20 million, simply by buying and holding.

Holding the shares away from shorts also increases the cost of borrowing for shorts, who at one point this week were being charged one-third of the price of the stock for the right to short it. At current prices, that means it would cost about $100 to short the stock, which means any profit would depend on the stock price falling by at least that much. Which it isn't doing.

Research firm S3 calculates that short sellers have lost $5 billion on GameStop so far this year. At least two have seen their stakes completely wiped out.

GameStop hasn't turned a profit since 2017, but the stock's price is up 1,000 per cent in recent weeks. (Carlo Allegri/Bloomberg)

The Redditor cited above declined an interview request with CBC News for this story, but he is far from the only one buying.

Alex Panayi is a regular contributor to the forum, and he says he saw a good investment case for the company months ago, based on their core business of selling video games. He took his first stake at around $30 and sold a bit at $55 but soon regretted it. Once he saw the momentum gathering, he added to his position again and again, even buying as high as $86 because, he said, the math added up. He could buy in relatively low into a business legitimately turning itself around, with the added bonus that he knew Wall Street had bet wrong and would have to buy in, too, to cover their bad bets.

"It's not the retail investors being greedy, it's ... the short sellers," he said in an interview. 

At one point, short interest in the stock topped 140 per cent. That means short sellers were trying to short more shares of GameStop than there are in existence.

"That's greedy, and when that happens, they open themselves up for this huge risk," Panayi said.

LISTEN: CBC's Front Burner looked at the GamStop saga, and what it all means

Shares of the video game retailer GameStop soared by 1,000 per cent in less than two weeks, thanks in part to a popular subreddit called r/WallStreetBets. This, at the expense of several Wall Street investment funds that bet against GameStop and lost billions of dollars. Today on Front Burner, business reporter Pete Evans is here to explain the GameStop saga, and what it reveals about the stock market writ large. 28:15

Winning one for the little guy

While he's enjoying the financial windfall of his savvy trade — "I have plans for a down payment on a house," he said — Panayi is one of many on the forum who are savouring the feeling that the little guy can get one over on the big guns once in a while.

The mainstream investment world treats retail investors "like we don't know what's best for us," he says, so they gate-keep information and charge fees for bad advice and more fees to act on it.

Canada's BlackBerry is one of many stocks to have seen recent runs in its share price, based almost solely on retail investor enthusiasm. (Andrew Ryan/Canadian Press)

But online communities on platforms such as Reddit are letting people share their research for free while zero-commission brokerages such as Robinhood — aptly named after the English folk hero who robbed from the rich to give to the poor — are shaking up the industry.

"I think this is a big scare to them because ... retail investors, we can make decisions for ourselves," Panayi said.

"We have some leverage in this thing [because] they screwed up ... but that doesn't mean that the other side is like the devil or something."

Other targets

GameStop investors aren't the only ones benefiting from the trend. A slew of previously moribund stocks have been on a tear of late, with tech companies such as BlackBerry (up 500 per cent since Christmas), movie chain AMC (up 300 per cent on Wednesday alone), U.S. retailer Bed Bath and Beyond (up 250 per cent since December) and even candy brand Tootsie Roll seeing outsized gains this week — with the latter's shares up a sickly sweet 53 per cent on Wednesday alone.

The companies have little in common, save for the fact that many have been shorted by Wall Street, and all have become the darling of retail investors eschewing the advice of the pros who get paid to pick winners and losers.

Dan Kent, the CEO of investment research portal StockTrades.ca, says he's noticed the trend.

While he says members of his online investor community are nowhere near as colourful — or adventurous when it comes to risk — as the Redditors, he has detected a similar trend afoot as more new investors pile into rising names.

"This is definitely a rise of retail investors that are essentially sick and tired of these companies coming out and short selling these stocks," he said in an interview.

His site has had 250,000 views in the past week or so. That's more than twice as much traffic as it would have seen about a year ago. That also lines up with data that shows retail investors are making up about one-quarter of all stock trades right now. In 2019, they were barely 10 per cent.

German investment bank Deutsche Bank tabulated trading data in a report this week and found that retail traders are "largely responsible" for most high-flying stocks right now. 

"The bulk of the increase continues to be driven by very small contract sizes, reflecting retail buying," strategist Binky Chadha said in a recent investor note. 

"In our view, increased retail participation is largely responsible for elevated equity multiples."

Most of that money is moving from large profitable firms and toward more volatile names such as the ones listed above, many with slim to no profitability, he said.

While Kent says he can sympathize with the desire to teach Wall Street short sellers an expensive lesson, he worries about how this will end for small investors jumping in now.

"A lot of them don't know what they're doing," he said. "Eventually, the bottom will fall out ,and a lot of retail investors who got in too late are going to lose a fortune."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Pete Evans

Senior Writer, CBCNews.ca

Pete Evans is the senior business writer for CBCNews.ca. Prior to coming to the CBC, his work has appeared in the Globe & Mail, the Financial Post, the Toronto Star, Canadian Business Magazine and — believe it or not — Circuits Assembly Magazine. Twitter: @p_evans Email: pete.evans@cbc.ca Secure PGP: https://secure.cbc.ca/public-key/Pete-Evans-pub.asc

Comments

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Become a CBC Member

Join the conversationCreate account

Already have an account?

now