Trade disruption would likely spell the end of North American jobs surge: Don Pittis

Employment numbers in Canada and the U.S. may already be feeling the effects of President Donald Trump's trade war threats. Don Pittis explains why Trump's battle plan to save American jobs won't work.

But signs of a return to free trade could boost markets and employment

A worker in Cornwall, Ont., cuts a steel beam. Rather than creating jobs, experts say a trade war will make steel prices higher everywhere and cut into the profit margins of industrial users. (James MacDonald/Bloomberg)

Ironically, U.S. President Donald Trump's strident views on trade have turned the humdrum subject of exports and imports into the stuff of water cooler chatter.

Presidential quotes that include hot words like "war" and "winning" are front-page news around the world.

But the real economic bottom line in any trade action won't be net exports, but whether Trump's trade disruption will throttle down the North American job-creation machine, whose latest numbers will be released Friday.

We expect more news on Trump's tariff plans as soon as today, and there are now signs that, under pressure from U.S. free traders, the president might spare Canada and Mexico.

The overwhelming expert opinion is that if Trump were to go ahead with his big tariffs on steel and aluminum, jobs would suffer.

Fighting the 'cheats'

The message that Trump's America will fight back against trade cheats to make the country great again worked in the presidential election campaign.

There are some signs it is still working among his core supporters, according to Bloomberg.

"There's a feeling of identity with Trump," Yale University economist and Nobel Prize winner Robert Shiller told the news service. "The man they identify with is in power and that's exhilarating."

But a report released this week from the Brookings Institution, a D.C.-based think-tank, shows many U.S. voters from all sides of the political spectrum are already worried about the effect of Trump's anti-trade attitude on jobs.

A steelworker stops for a picture high above the streets of New York. The building boom that made American steel skywalkers famous has now moved to places like China. (Peter Morgan/Reuters)
Support for the president's proposed tariffs is even weaker than his approval rating, with the vast majority seeing trade as good for the U.S. economy and good for consumers.

"Only 28 per cent agree with Mr. Trump's statement that a trade war would be good for the United States; fully 64 per cent reject it, including 71 per cent of Independents and 50 per cent of non-college whites," the report says.

Job killers

Among experts it is difficult to find voices defending Trump's tariff and trade war policy as being good for U.S. jobs.

The essential economic argument is that while some jobs in specific steel and aluminum plants would benefit, those have to be weighed against job losses — or reduced job creation — in other sectors.

U.S. factory bosses worry that even within the steel sector itself, manufacturers will be damaged by the tariff.

Just as Canada exports pulp and bitumen to the U.S. to be upgraded into higher value products, countries including Brazil, Russia and Mexico send unfinished steel to the U.S. to be transformed using sophisticated technology and sold at a higher price.

​That upgrading of relatively raw materials, or value added, is one of the strengths of trade.

U.S. President Donald Trump is reportedly considering whether to spare Canada from his proposed steel and aluminum tariffs. (Leah Mills/Reuters)

Canada and the U.S. both export and import about the same amount of steel. Suddenly with a 25 per cent tariff, importers could be forced to try to ship goods east and west across the country instead of north and south across the border. The inefficiencies would be absurd.

The inevitable effect is that the price of U.S. steel and aluminum would rise. The price of products made with that steel and aluminum would also rise, making U.S. products less competitive at home and in foreign markets.

In the case of aluminum, the U.S. produces a fraction of its needs, meaning a trade war could leave it short of the metal for making all kinds of goods, including civilian and military aircraft.

Free trade rebound

And all that ignores the risk to U.S. exports if countries decide to retaliate. Forget Europe's threat to Kentucky corn whisky, if Mexico were to decide to stop buying actual U.S. corn and milk products, the effect on Midwest farmers would be devastating.

As the Bank of Canada showed yesterday, the automatic stabilizing effect of currency movements following a trade disruption could result in all U.S. goods and services becoming more expensive here. After the central bank's statement cited trade as one of its concerns preventing it from raising rates, the Canadian dollar declined, dipping below 77 cents US, but bounced back after rumours started circulating that Trump's worst provisions were off the table.

Bank of Canada governor Stephen Poloz has already worried publicly that trade fears are having an adverse effect on jobs and the economy as companies hold off on investments until they see whether a NAFTA deal can be done.

By extension, the same considerations will apply to all North American investors until they see the final version of Trump's tariff plans.

By contrast, clear signs of a resolution on steel, aluminum and NAFTA would likely have the opposite effect on the markets and the economy. They would also be good for jobs.

Follow Don on Twitter @don_pittis

More analysis from Don Pittis


Don Pittis

Business columnist

Don Pittis was a forest firefighter, and a ranger in Canada's High Arctic islands. After moving into journalism, he was principal business reporter for Radio Television Hong Kong before the handover to China. He has produced and reported for the CBC in Saskatchewan and Toronto and the BBC in London. He is currently senior producer at CBC's business unit.


To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Become a CBC Member

Join the conversation  Create account

Already have an account?