How rewards programs like Air Miles could appease angry customers
Consumer group wants industry-wide guidelines for loyalty programs
There's no question that Air Miles is facing a public relations battle.
As customers rush to redeem their miles before the looming expiry date, many continue to be frustrated with the program — complaining about everything from the expiry date itself to limited rewards options for aging miles.
"I'm just going to throw the card away," Toronto Air Miles collector John MacKenzie told CBC News, after failing to find a satisfactory way to use up his points.
- Air Miles hiding merchandise, claim customers
- Air Miles rewards lacking for expiring points, customers complain
- Your Air Miles could expire soon: What you need to know
This isn't the first time an expiry rule has generated a consumer backlash. In 2013, Aeroplan backtracked on a plan to implement an expiry date for all points following customer complaints.
The travel rewards program is also facing two lawsuits, one a class action, over a separate expiry rule it didn't nix.
One possible solution to avoid such customer furor in the future would be for rewards programs to adopt clearly laid out industry-wide rules, especially for when they slap on an expiry date.
"Put it in bold print, really tell people what they're possibly facing," advised Lindsay Meredith, a marketing professor at Simon Fraser University. "And then if they want to play under those rules, fine, they've been forewarned."
Canada's Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) has been calling for industry-wide guidelines for rewards programs since 2013.
"This is a very hodgepodge, hit and miss kind of area," said PIAC's Jonathan Bishop. "There's no certainty for the consumer."
PIAC would also like to see an independent complaints commission that consumers can turn to when they have beefs about their rewards program.
Establishing industry standards would benefit not only consumers, but could also help loyalty programs keep current customers and entice new members.
"Why the hell would they start using your product when it looks like there's big trouble trying to play the game with them?" asked professor Meredith.
Changing the rules of the game
PIAC would like to see blanket guidelines for notifying customers when rewards programs change their policies, such as devaluing the points customers earn or introducing an expiry date.
"There's no rules around a notice period," Bishop said.
Air Miles says it gave customers plenty of notice that miles older than five years would start expiring in 2017. In late 2011, it noted the coming change near the bottom of a news release about a new cash rewards program.
Since then, it has posted information online for customers. "We have made expiry information very easy to find on our website," spokeswoman Natasha Lasiuk said in an email last month.
Until recently, collectors had to navigate the website's FAQ section to learn details.
In late July, Air Miles sent an email to customers warning about the coming expiry date. It also now posts the news in a pop-up message on its site. The move followed stories by CBC News about the rule change and customer frustrations.
Aeroplan battles lawsuits
Aeroplan is facing two lawsuits over a change to its expiry rules.
In late 2006, Aeroplan announced that starting July 1, 2007, members would lose all their miles if they didn't add or redeem points at least once over 12 months. Expired accounts could be reinstated for a fee.
The lawsuits allege the rule change was a breach of contract and that customers didn't receive adequate notice.
Mississauga Aeroplan customer Steve Woloshyn says he joined the class action after 365,000 points were wiped from his account due to 12 months of inactivity.
"I was shocked," said Woloshyn, who had been saving his miles to take his wife to Australia and says he didn't know they were at risk of expiring. "It was like somebody deflated my balloon."
Aeroplan's owner, Aimia, says it believes it has strong arguments to get the class action dismissed.
"It has always been our aim to ensure that Aeroplan's terms and conditions remain not only fair but are clear to members," Aimia spokeswoman Christa Poole said in an email to CBC News.
"Expiry policies are very common in the loyalty and frequent flyer industries."
Even so, newly introduced ones continue to outrage many customers, especially if they learned the news late in the game. But if there was a clear, standard policy for how members must be notified, perhaps companies could avoid some of that outrage and messy legal battles.
Rules of engagement
Air Miles is also facing a customer backlash after some collectors compared their membership accounts and discovered the company makes different rewards available to different customers.
Air Miles told CBC News it bases rewards selections on a collector's past purchases and level of engagement with the program. The company contends this form of "personalization" has become standard industry practice.
But perhaps it should also be standard industry practice to reveal this information to customers when they choose their rewards. CBC continues to receive angry emails from collectors, including one who told us, "This is despicable."
Sure, rewards programs are under no obligation to establish industry-wide standards. But, as PIAC points out, the effort could wind up a win-win situation where rewards programs generate more customer loyalty.
"The more confident consumers are" in understanding the rules of the game, said Bishop, "the more confident they are to participate in the program."