Burma moves to abolish media censorship
- August 20, 2012 12:46 PM |
- By Adrienne Arsenault
The red pen retired? Really? That seems to be the essence of the news out of Burma today; that finally direct media censorship has officially ended. Sounds good. Perhaps too good to be true.
In Burma, just a few months ago, we watched as the young journalists and editors kept amazing restraint as they submitted stories to official government censors and then got them back covered in red ink. The practice was among the most onerous in the world and the censorship was so strict it meant newspapers could only publish weekly, not daily. It took THAT long for the censors to sift through every single sentence. But the stories and words the censors scratched out on the proofs were a bit unpredictable.
In the silky late night heat of March, we stood with editor Thomas Kean of the Myanmar Times as he was on a deadline. He shook his head at the fresh red marks from the censors.
Download Flash Player to view this content.
Nope to references to poverty. Nope to suggestions of youth dissatisfaction. Even the word CRITICISM was too sensitive. But there have been the odd surprises too. A story about the pain of farmers was accepted. Then, these were viewed as tiny triumphs; signs among many that Burma was changing, opening up.
One of the world's most oppressive regimes has been slowly reaching out. Burma's legacy has been one of vicious repression but its rulers have realized they need the worlds' business and the worlds' business truly wants in on what Burma has to offer.
So, they are opting for what, on the surface, seems a kinder, gentler approach. This is good, but there's always a catch.
Back in March, the old and young alike embraced the new freedoms but cast suspicious eyes on what was happening. Their fear has been that they would be tricked into fully expressing themselves and then policies would be reversed--and they'd be severely punished.
It's a human rights horror movie that's played out before. Now, too, some suspicions.
Direct censorship may be over, and this is a key step, but journalists are far from safe. They are still subject to jail terms if they jeopardize whatever the rulers deem to be a matter of national security.
Rules are still murky and still threatening.
All News blogs
- The Meaning of Charity
- What does charity mean to you? Most of us have, at one time or another, thought about what we would do if we won "the big one." There would be money for kids, money for relatives, money for trips, money for... Continue reading this post
- Prohibited snakes and other reptiles: A city-by-city comparison
- We've taken a look at the bylaws in major Canadian cities to see how they regulate the ownership of snakes and other reptiles. Here's a quick summary of what we've found.... Continue reading this post